Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 14;27(2):189–207. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i2.189

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate-Cox regression analyses of prognostic factors in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated by transarterial chemoembolization in the training cohort

Variable
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Score
Before first TACE
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
B
Age (yr), < 60/≥ 60 0.781 0.324-1.012 0.124
Sex, male/female 0.891 0.456-1.213 0.211
HBsAg status, positive/negative 0.671 0.319-0.987 0.121
Child-Pugh class, A/B 1.178 0.614-1.418 0.256
Largest tumor size (cm), < 5/≥ 5 1.619 1.671-2.341 0.005 1.312 0.981-1.992 < 0.001 0.4168 1
Tumor number, solitary/multiple 1.987 1.561-2.354 0.007 1.289 1.481-2.002 < 0.001 0.3178 1
BCLC stage, A/B 1.671 1.319-1.987 <0.001 1.789 1.289-2.112 < 0.001 0.4288 1
AFP (IU/mL), < 200/≥ 200 0.678 0.214-1.018 0.128
ECOG performance status score, 0/1/2 1.102 0.781-1.456 0.199
AST (U/L), < 40/≥ 40 0.543 0.178-0.967 0.089
Irregular tumor margin, absent/present 1.562 1.211-1.897 < 0.001 1.457 1.090-2.089 < 0.001 0.404 1
Capsule, absent/present 1.432 1.121-1.976 0.032 1.321 1.007-1.764 0.082

The regression coefficients (B) in multivariate-Cox regression analysis were multiplied by 2 and rounded to calculate the clinical score. The clinical model used the median value (2) of total score (4) to stratify patients into high and low-risk group. HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; TACE, Transarterial chemoembolization; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; AFP: Alpha fetoprotein; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CI: Confidence interval.