Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 7;8:51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.11.007

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(Left) DVH of PTV comparison for plan optimized with MRI-delineated prostate and conventional expansion methods (isotropic 8 mm, except 5 mm posterior) showing under-dosing of the conventional CT-expanded PTV. (Right) DVH of PTV comparison for plan optimized with MRI-based delineation and expansion method showing comparable coverage to conventional CT-expanded PTV.