Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;18(12):364–370. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.09.001

Table 2.

Measures used for calculating drug doses and associated formulae

Term Derivation Explanation Use Advantages Disadvantages
TBW (kg) LBW+FW TBW, as measured, includes both fat and lean weight
  • Dosing of many drugs; most appropriate in the non-obese (where TBW tends to LBW).

  • Succinyl choline.

  • TIVA maintenance (accounts for larger compartment size).

  • Easy to measure and is widely used.

  • Validated for normal-weight population.

  • May lead to overdose if used in the obese population.

  • Does not account for pharmacogenetics or sex differences in metabolism.

  • TIVA boluses by TBW may exaggerate haemodynamic effects.

LBW (kg)7 1.1×TBW–0.0128×BMI×TBW (male); 1.07×TBW–0.0148×BMI×TBW (female) LBW comprised of the non-adipose tissues
  • Useful for polar drugs with a small VD, such as NMBAs

  • TCIs (bolus induction: avoids overdosing and instability)

  • Correlates with metabolism and clearance

  • Accounts for sex-related differences in metabolism

  • Less prone to overdosing in obese populations

  • Several formulae for calculation, and may be complex

  • Error prone, particularly at extremes of weight, depending on formula used

  • Does not account for pharmacogenetic differences in metabolism

  • Not possible to measure directly in clinical practice

IBW (kg)8 22×height2 (m) The weight of an individual based on height and assuming a normal BMI of 22
  • Recommended for calculation of local anaesthetic maximal doses

  • Used for selection of tracheal tube size

  • Originally shown to be consistent with the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin

  • Easily calculated (although measures of height in critically ill patients can be challenging)

  • Does not account for pharmacogenetics or age-related differences in metabolism

  • Assumes 15% body fat, which is not ‘normal’ across all age ranges

ABW (kg) LBW+C×(TBW–LBW) (where C is a drug-specific correction based on the solubility of the drug) Assumes drug distribution to lean tissues and a proportion of the FW depending on the physiochemical properties of the drug
  • Dosing of drugs with a narrow therapeutic index (e.g. gentamicin)

  • Drug specific

  • Requires calculation using a correction factor specific to every drug

  • Uses LBW (which may be error prone, depending on the formula used)

  • Does not account for pharmacogenetic differences in metabolism

Body surface area9 (m2) Weight0.425×height0.725×0.007184 Based on the surface area given height and weight, both of which are easily measured
  • Mostly only used for dosing chemotherapy agents

  • Easily calculated

  • Requires calculation

  • Does not account for pharmacogenetic differences in metabolism

  • Not validated; poor correlation with clearance

PNWT10 (kg) 1.57×weight−0.0183×BMI×WT−10.5 (male)
1.75×Weight−0.0242×BMI×WT−12.6 (female)
Consists of lean and fatty weight, corrected for the non-obese individual, an extension of IBW
  • Developed to overcome limitations of scaling to LBW or TBW

  • Not validated or in widespread clinical use currently

  • Specifically derived for drug dosing (rather than classification of obesity)

  • Includes sex, weight and height

  • Complicated to calculate

  • Does not account for pharmacogenetic differences in metabolism

  • Not validated

PBW (kg) 50+[0.91×(height in cm–152.4)] (males); 45.5+[0.91×(height in cm–152.4)] (females) Based on the original ARDSNet study, normalises to lung size; comparable to IBW
  • Used for calculating ventilatory requirements

  • Does not have a significant role in drug dosing

  • Considers height, weight, and sex

  • Requires calculation (both height and weight can be difficult to measure in critical illness)