Table 4.
Profile and characteristics of publications reporting the processes that promoted evidence-to-policy process in health intervention in Lusophone countries of West Africa
| Country | Author/year of publication | Health policy focus | Key policy components assessed | Findings/evidence generated | Implication for evidence-to-policy process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cape Verde | Nabyonga-Orem et al., 201616 | Health policy dialog | Policy dialog operational process, for interactive and evidence sharing | Ensuring stakeholder participation, improving stakeholder harmonization and alignment, and improved evidence-to-policy process | Policy dialogue offers the opportunity to improve stakeholder participation in policy development and promote effectiveness of foreign aid |
| Dovlo et al., 201617 | Policy dialogs | Participation in the policy dialogs | Dialog success factors: the use of innovative approaches, good facilitation, and good communication | Policy dialog is an effective tool in health sector management and could be a crucial component of the governance dynamics of the sector | |
| Guinea Bissau | Kok et al., 201226 | HRS | Assessment of how the HRS emerged and evolved and how the system functions | The volatile and resource-dependent context, changes in donor policies, training of local researchers, and nature of the research findings influenced HRS | If research is to contribute to local decision-making, it is essential to link research to decision-making processes |
| Tyrrell et al., 201027 | HRH | Practice of costing exercises and HRH costing methodologies | Costing exercises represented an important driver of the HRDP | Bottom-up and country-specific costing methodologies have the potential to serve adequately the multifaceted purpose of the HRDP |
HRH: Human resources for health, HRDP: Human Resources Development Plans, HRS: Health research systems