Table 4.
Measurement Quality |
Std. bias |
Rel SE bias (%) |
95% CI coverage rate (%) |
RMSE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted One-step | Good | −0.01 | 2.76 | 94.90 | 0.059 |
Weak | 0.01 | 4.84 | 95.30 | 0.069 | |
Modal | Good | −0.55 | 3.66 | 89.50 | 0.049 |
Weak | −0.84 | 3.52 | 85.30 | 0.052 | |
ML Modal | Good | −0.02 | 3.52 | 95.30 | 0.059 |
Weak | −0.06 | 3.50 | 94.40 | 0.069 | |
ML Proportional | Good | −0.03 | 20.29 | 97.40 | 0.057 |
Weak | −0.06 | 24.62 | 97.20 | 0.067 | |
BCH Modal | Good | −0.02 | −13.56 | 89.20 | 0.059 |
Weak | −0.06 | −23.86 | 85.80 | 0.069 | |
BCH Modal & robust | Good | −0.02 | 3.78 | 95.20 | 0.059 |
Weak | −0.06 | 3.95 | 94.30 | 0.069 | |
BCH Proportional | Good | −0.04 | −10.66 | 91.10 | 0.057 |
Weak | −0.06 | −21.32 | 87.10 | 0.066 | |
BCH Proportional & robust | Good | −0.04 | 3.646 | 94.50 | 0.057 |
Weak | −0.06 | 1.274 | 94.00 | 0.066 |
Note. Modal=standard three-step approach with modal assignment; ML Modal=modern three-step approach with modal assignment and maximum likelihood correction method; ML Proportional= modern three-step approach with proportional assignment and maximum likelihood correction method; BCH Modal=modern three-step approach with modal assignment and BCH correction method; modern three-step approach with proportional assignment and BCH correction method. robust=robust standard error estimator. Values exceeding the recommended cutoffs are in boldface.