Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 21;162(2):471–489. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002053

Table 5.

Best subsets of factors (as measured in RS1) for predicting overall change in pain intensity and CRPS severity throughout the study period (intention-to-treat analysis).

Best subsets models Adj. R2 AIC CV
Change in pain intensity
 Model 1: (+) absolute change in handedness* 0.09 −132.24 0.28
 Model 2: (+) absolute change in handedness,* (+) index A of directional bradykinesia for the unaffected hand 0.13 −119.08 0.29
 Model 3: (+) oedema difference,** (−) index B of directional hypokinesia for the affected hand,** (−) delta finger-to-palm distance ratio* 0.25 −105.79 0.30
 Model 4: (+) oedema difference,** (−) index B of directional hypokinesia for the affected hand,* (−) delta finger-to-palm distance ratio,* (+) mood disturbance 0.27 −105.68 0.30
 Model 5: (+) oedema difference,** (−) index B of directional hypokinesia for the affected hand,** (+) Mental Number Line Bisection score,* (+) absolute change in handedness, (−) delta finger-to-palm distance ratio 0.32 −107.60 0.35
Change in CRPS severity
 Model 1: (+) current pain intensity** 0.13 −50.21 0.58
 Model 2: (+) current pain intensity,** (−) index B of directional bradykinesia for the unaffected hand* 0.23 −48.39 0.60
 Model 3: (+) current pain intensity,*** (+) oedema difference,* (+) hand laterality recognition accuracy index* 0.25 −55.52 0.54
 Model 4: (+) allodynia on the affected limb,* (−) index B of directional bradykinesia for the unaffected hand,* (−) index B of directional hypokinesia for the unaffected limb,* (+) disease duration 0.21 −45.66 0.62
 Model 5: (−) index B of directional bradykinesia for the unaffected hand,* (−) index B of directional hypokinesia for the unaffected limb, (+) allodynia on the affected limb, (+) disease duration, (+) body perception disturbance score 0.21 −44.84 0.62

Figures in bold indicate the lowest AIC and CV.

* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 indicate significant predictors; (+), positive predictor; (−), negative predictor.

Predicted outcomes were quantified as individual regression slopes based on pain intensity ratings throughout RS1-RS4 and LTFU1-LTFU2 and CRPS severity scores throughout RS1-RS4 (negative slopes indicate reductions in pain/CRPS severity).

Adj. R2, adjusted R-squared; AIC, Akaike information criterion; CRPS, complex regional pain syndrome; CV, cross-validation error; LTFU1 and LTFU2, long-term follow-ups 1 and 2; RS, RS1, RS2, RS3, and RS4, research sessions 1, 2, 3, and 4.