Table 1.
NG | IDAG | IPC-L | IPC-H | IPS-L | IPS-H | FS-L | FS-H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parturition rate (%) | 79.26 | 44.83 | 80 | 66.7 | 73.33 | 80.00 | 86.67 | 60.00 |
Average No. of total born per litter | 7.89 ± 1.94 | 3.77 ± 2.00** | 5.83 ± 2.25 | 6.40 ± 2.01# | 6.09 ± 2.17 | 6.75 ± 3.05# | 6.92 ± 1.60## | 8.00 ± 2.45## |
Average No. of total born alive per litter | 7.78 ± 1.99 | 2.92 ± 1.44** | 4.79 ± 2.83 | 4.50 ± 2.84 | 6.00 ± 2.10# | 6.42 ± 2.94## | 6.85 ± 1.63## | 7.33 ± 3.61## |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, compared with NG, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, compared with IDAG. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was used for comparison among 8 different groups.