Table 3.
Group | Out of the hair (d) | Tooth eruption (d) | Eyes open (d) | Rate o born alive per litter at PND28 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 3.313 ± 0.6021 | 7.176 ± 0.809 | 14.62 ± 0.5064 | 0.9851 ± 0.04342 |
IDAG | 4.545 ± 1.128** | 8.545 ± 1.508** | 14.44 ± 0.7265 | 0.2303 ± 0.3959** |
IPC-L | 3.083 ± 0.5149## | 6.917 ± 0.5149## | 14.33 ± 0.7785 | 0.9861 ± 0.04811## |
IPC-H | 3.1 ± 0.7379## | 6.6 ± 0.6992## | 14.22 ± 1.394 | 0.9732 ± 0.05663## |
IPS-L | 3.6 ± 0.5164# | 6.727 ± 0.9045## | 14.44 ± 0.8819 | 0.9886 ± 0.03769## |
IPS-H | 3.091 ± 0.5394## | 6.909 ± 0.8312## | 14.36 ± 0.809 | 0.9467 ± 0.1069## |
FS-L | 3.308 ± 0.7511## | 7.077 ± 0.8623## | 14.25 ± 0.6216 | 0.9890 ± 0.03962## |
FS-H | 3 ± 0.5345## | 7.375 ± 0.5175# | 14 ± 0.8944 | 1.000 ± 0.0## |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, compared with NG, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, compared with IDAG. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was used for comparison among 8 different groups.