Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;69(1):232–245. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c06622

Table 2. Tentative Identifications and Comparison of the Discriminant Metabolites in TFDG and EGCG Treated Samples after 48 h of Fermentation.

                TFDG vs blank
EGCG vs blank
TFDG vs EGCG
ID RT (min) tentative identification formula m/za Δ m/z (ppm)b MS2 fragments VIP score Fc pd Fc pd Fc pd
Negative ionization mode
1 7.69 5-(3′,4′-dihydroxyphenyl)valeric acid C11H14O4 209.08130 2.98 123.08011; 81.03308; 87.92377; 147.07928; 149.45479 1.98 0.03 0.89 3.66 0.00 –3.58 0.00
2 6.55 5-(3′,4′-dihydroxyphenyl) -γ-valerolactone C11H12O4 207.06569 2.86 81.03300; 122.03589; 75.00153; 163.07542 1.98 0.14 0.31 4.15 0.00 –3.97 0.04
3 5.55 5-(3′,4′,5′-trihydroxyphenyl)valeric acid C11H14O5 225.07640 1.96 81.03300; 123.04277; 1.97 1.36 0.41 5.21 0.00 –3.83 0.00
4 5.54 5-(3′,5′-dihydroxyphenyl) -γ-valerolactone C11H12O4 207.06569 2.86 75.00152; 87.92372; 122.03590; 118.99174 1.97 –0.06 0.61 4.73 0.00 –4.72 0.07
5 5.69 unknown   199.06039   n.d. 1.72 0.27 0.34 2.87 0.03 –1.90 0.04
6 9.10 theanaphthoquinone C28H22O11 533.10870 0.43 349.07144; 125.02302; 137.02310; 165.01793 1.62 4.83 0.00 –0.06 0.66 5.03 0.00
7 8.27 unknown   243.02988   n.d. 1.56 2.70 0.01 –0.10 0.71 2.72 0.01
Positive ionization mode
8 6.55 5-(3′,4′-dihydroxyphenyl) -γ-valerolactone C11H12O4 209.08096 –0.56 123.04430; 68.99796; 149.05981; 84.96044; 91.05495 2.10 0.10 0.05 3.67 0.00 –3.55 0.03
9 5.54 5-(3′,4′,5′-trihydroxyphenyl)valeric acid C11H14O5 227.09152 –0.52 n.d. 2.06 0.09 0.17 4.84 0.00 –4.51 0.03
10 5.55 5-(3′,5′-dihydroxyphenyl) -γ-valerolactone C11H12O4 209.08101 –0.80 68.99792; 123.04436; 121.06515; 149.05972; 81.07054 2.04 0.06 0.22 5.05 0.00 –4.70 0.03
11 9.10 theanaphthoquinone C28H22O11 535.12311 0.71 n.d. 1.64 2.89 0.00 0.02 0.64 2.93 0.00
12 8.72 unknown   169.08500   n.d. 1.50 –0.73 0.02 0.68 0.14 –1.74 0.19
a

Measured [M – H] in negative ionization mode or measured [M + H]+ in positive ionization mode.

b

Difference between calculated and experimental m/z.

c

log2 fold change of average peak areas (n = 4).

d

p value in Student’s t-test (n = 4); n.d., not detected.