Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 25;29:102548. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102548

Table 4.

Evaluation metrics of the reperfused and non-reperfused models after successive ablation of the MRI inputs, tested among (a) reperfused and (b) non-reperfused patients, respectively (average values ± standard deviation). Bold values correspond to the best value of the respective evaluation metric (column-wise). A two-sided wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed between the full models with all 5 MRI inputs and the ablated ones, with (.) indicating P < 0.10, (*) indicating P < 0.05, (**) indicating P < 0.01 and (***) indicating P < 0.001.

(a) Reperfused model: ablation study among reperfused patients
Input MRI DSC VS Precision Recall HD
DWI + ADC + Tmax+CBF + CBV 0.44 ± 0.21 0.66 ± 0.26 0.39 ± 0.25 0.63 ± 0.21 30.61 ± 16.1
DWI + ADC + Tmax 0.44 ± 0.25 0.70 ± 0.26 0.54 ± 0.28 (***) 0.46 ± 0.27 (**) 35.13 ± 15.6 (.)
DWI 0.42 ± 0.24 (*) 0.70 ± 0.26 0.51 ± 0.28 0.44 ± 0.27 (***) 31.28 ± 16.1 (**)
ADC 0.40 ± 0.24 (***) 0.67 ± 0.28 (.) 0.47 ± 0.27 (.) 0.43 ± 0.27 (***) 34.35 ± 20.4 (*)
Tmax 0.32 ± 0.20 (***) 0.63 ± 0.30 (*) 0.44 ± 0.25 (*) 0.35 ± 0.25 (***) 29.99 ± 13.7 (**)
(b) Non-reperfused model: ablation study among non-reperfused patients
Input MRI DSC VS Precision Recall HD
DWI + ADC + Tmax+CBF + CBV 0.47 ± 0.17 0.74 ± 0.13 0.49 ± 0.22 0.52 ± 0.21 37.70 ± 17.7
DWI + ADC + Tmax 0.47 ± 0.18 0.74 ± 0.16 0.52 ± 0.22 0.50 ± 0.22 35.77 ± 20.2
DWI 0.45 ± 0.17 0.71 ± 0.17 0.50 ± 0.22 0.50 ± 0.25 33.20 ± 17.2
ADC 0.42 ± 0.15 (.) 0.73 ± 0.23 0.47 ± 0.18 0.46 ± 0.21 (.) 28.35 ± 12.9 (**)
Tmax 0.40 ± 0.19 (*) 0.65 ± 0.21 0.50 ± 0.29 0.46 ± 0.24 (**) 26.86 ± 13.3 (.)