Table 5.
Articles | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | Total No. of Checks | % of the Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ma Dan et al17 | √ | √ | √√ | – | √ | √ | √ | √ | - - | - - | - | √ √ | √ | √ - | 12/20 | 60 |
Deguchi et al18 | √ | √ | √ √ | -- | √ | √ | - | √ | - - | - - | - | √√ | √ | √ - | 11/20 | 55 |
Notes: √, Fully fulfilled the methodological criteria (1 check point). √ √, Fully fulfilled the methodological criteria (2 check points). ≠, Partially fulfilled the methodological criteria (0.5 check point). -, Did not fulfill the methodological criteria (0 check point); - -, Did not fulfill the methodological criteria (0 check point). Criteria are given in Table 1.