Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 15;23:8. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01382-8

Table 2.

Best overall response: phase II part

Xe1000+Ev10+Ex25 (n = 70) Ev10+Ex25 (n = 70)
Best overall response
 CR 1 (1.4) 0
 PR 4 (5.7) 7 (10.0)
 Non-CR/non-PD, n (%) 10 (14.3) 8 (11.4)
  Non-CR/non-PD ≥ 24 weeks 4 (5.7) 3 (4.3)
 SD, n (%) 28 (40.0) 32 (45.7)
  SD ≥ 24 weeks 4 (5.7) 7 (10.0)
 PD, n (%) 16 (22.9) 14 (20.0)
 Not evaluable, n (%) 11 (15.7) 9 (12.9)
OR, n (%) 5 (7.1) 7 (10.0)
 Odds ratio (95% CI) [P value] 0.70 (0.20–2.32) [P = 0.5598]
 Median time to OR, months (range) 3.7 (1.8–5.3) 1.8 (1.6–7.2)
 Median duration of OR, months (95% CI) 5.6 (NC–NC) NC (1.8–NC)
Disease control, n (%) 13 (18.6) 17 (24.3)
 Odds ratio (95% CI) [P value] 0.70 (0.31–1.59) [P = 0.4008]
 Median duration of disease control, months (95% CI) NC (9.2–NC) 9.3 (9.0–NC)

CI confidence interval, CR complete response, NC not calculable, OR objective response, PD progressive disease, PR partial response, SD stable disease

Odds ratio and P value are obtained from logistic regression model adjusted for visceral involvement at screening. An odds ratio > 1 favours Xe1000+Ev10+Ex25

Kaplan–Meier estimates