Table-S3.
Articles (n=13) reported antimicrobial-resistant pathogens and genes in dairy and other animals of Bangladesh.
| Author, Year | Title of the article | Type of study | Key findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rahman et al., 2013 [47] | Isolation and Identification of Bacterial Agents Causing Clinical Mastitis in Cattle in Mymensingh and Their Antibiogram Profile | Short communication | •Staphylococcus spp. (62.5%), Streptococcus spp. (56.25%), Bacillus spp. (37.5%), and E. coli (31.25%) were identified as causal agents of mastitis |
| •Chloramphenicol and erythromycin were found effective for the treatment of mastitis | |||
| Ahmed et al., 2013 [19] | The Central Cattle Breeding and Dairy Farm, Bangladesh waste contributes in emergence and spread of aminoglycoside-resistant bacteria | Research article | •Aminoglycoside antibiotics (Gentamycin, Kanamycin, and Streptomycin) resistant bacteria are spreading from dairy farm and veterinary clinics to environment |
| Hossain et al., 2013 [52] | Isolation, identification, and antibiogram study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Cattle in Bangladesh | Original article | •Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were resistant to ampicillin, oxytetracycline, tetracycline, and amoxicillin |
| Islam et al., 2013 [53] | Prevalence and AMR patterns of Vibrio Cholerae from Bangladesh | Research article | • All of the V. cholerae isolates milk, water, and feces of dairy farm were found MDR |
| Agricultural University dairy farm | •MDR V. cholerae isolates were resistant to erythromycin (95.23), azithromycin (76.9%), and ampicillin (52.38%) | ||
| Haque et al., 2014 [48] | Identification, Molecular Detection and Antibiogram Profile of Bacteria Isolated from California Mastitis Test Positive Milk Samples of Crossbred Cows of Satkhira District in Bangladesh | Research article | •S. aureus (49.09%), followed by E. coli (27.27%), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) spp. (18.18%) and Bacillus spp. (5.45%) were responsible for mastitis |
| •S. aureus isolates were found resistant to 5 antibiotics and E. coli to 9 antibiotics | |||
| •E. coli isolates were completely resistant to ampicillin (100%) and amoxicillin (100%) | |||
| Rana et al., 2016 [54] | Antibiotic Resistance, Microbial and Morphological Changes of Marketed Bovine Liver at Different Time Interval from Chittagong, Bangladesh: A Public Health Concern | Research article | •Bovine livers sold at retail meat shops are contaminated with high extent of MDR bacteria |
| Islam et al., 2016 [50] | Isolation and epidemiology of multidrug-resistant E. coli from goats in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh | Original article | •Overall prevalence of E. coli in the rectal swabs of goats was 52% |
| •Among the E. coli isolates, 39.74% were resistant to 3-8 subclasses of antibiotics | |||
| Das Guptaet al., 2017 [49] | Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of E. coli in cattle on Bathan and intensive rearing system | Research article | •The prevalence of E. coli was significantly high in cattle under intensive farming than cattle on Bathan |
| •Antibiotic-resistant E. coli isolates are present in cattle of different management systems | |||
| Hoque et al., 2018 [46] | Molecular characterization of S. aureus strains in bovine mastitis milk in Bangladesh | Research article | •S. aureus isolates from bovine subclinical mastitis milk showed highest resistance to oxytetracycline (74.5%), followed by oxacillin (55.9%), ciprofloxacin (49.6%), amoxicillin (42.0%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (30.0%), and to a less extent to gentamicin (17.9%), penicillin (11.0%), and erythromycin (8.2%) |
| Sobur et al., 2019 [17] | Antibiotic-resistant E. coli and Salmonella spp. associated with dairy cattle and farm environment having public health significance | Research article | •Dairy farm and their environmental components carry antibiotic-resistant pathogenic E. coli and Salmonella spp. |
| Jalal et al., 2019 [51] | ABR zoonotic bacteria in Irrawaddy squirrel (Callosciurus pygerythrus) | Original article | •Irrawaddy squirrels harbor several types of zoonotic pathogenic AMR bacteria |
| Siddiki et al., 2019 [45] | Comparison of Bacterial Pathogens Associated with Different Types of Bovine Mastitis and their antibiotic resistance Status in Bangladesh | Original article | •Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Bacillus spp., and E. coli are associated in 78.54%, 80%, and 71.67% mastitis cases as a single and in 21.46%, 20%, and 28.33% as mixed infection, respectively |
| •The isolates were resistant to streptomycin (70-100%), amoxicillin (30-100%), and ampicillin (100%) | |||
| Hoque et al., 2020 [18] | Insights into the Resistome of Bovine Clinical Mastitis Microbiome, a Key Factor in Disease Complication | Original research | •76.2% of six selected pathogens were highly resistant to tetracycline, doxycycline, nalidixic acid, ampicillin, and chloramphenicol |
| •Among the RATC functional groups, MDR to efflux pumps (MREP, 28.6%), CmeABC operon (8.9%), resistance to fluoroquinolones (RFL, 6.2%), mdtABCD cluster (5.5%), methicillin resistance in Staphylococci (MRS, 3.8%), BlaR1 regulatory family (BlaR1, 3.4%), MexE-MexFOprN (2.4%), and beta-lactamase resistance (BLAC, 2.2%) were the dominating ARGs found in CM milk microbiomes |
AMR=Antimicrobial resistance, MDR=Multidrug resistance, ARGs=Antibiotic resistance genes, E. coli=Escherichia coli, S. aureus=Staphylococcus aureus, ABR=Antibiotic-resistant