Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 14;9(6):369–379. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_59_20

Table 2.

Summary of single arm studies in EUS-biliary drainage

Author Study design Patients (n) Pathology Intervention Overall technical success rate, % (n) Overall Clinical Success Rate, %(n) Overall Adverse Events, %(n) Stent Migration %(n)
Hara et al. (2011)[21] Prospective, Single Center 18 MDBO EUS-CDS 94 (17/18) 100 (17/17) 17 (3/18) 5.6 (1/18)
Song et al. (2012)[20] Retrospective, Single Center 15 MDBO EUS-CDS 86.7 (13/15) 100 (13/13) 23.1 (3/13) 30.8 (4/13)
Kunda et al. (2016)[22] Retrospective, Multicenter 57 MDBO EUS CDS 98.2 (56/57) 94.7 (54/57) 9 (7/57) 1.7 (1/57)
Ogura et al. (2016)[27] Retrospective, single center 10 MHBO EUS-HGS 100 (10/10) 90 (9/10) 0 NA
Lu et al. (2017)[23] Retrospective, single center 24 MBO 17 EUS-CDS 4 EUS-HGS 95.8 (23/24) 100 (23/23) 13 (3/23) 0
Minaga et al. (2017)[25] Retrospective, single center 30 MHBO EUS-HGS 96.7 (29/30) 75.9 (22/29) 10 (3/30) 0
Moryouseff et al. (2017)[26] Prospective, single center 18 MHBO EUS-HGS 94 (17/18) 72.2 (13/17) 16.7 (3/18) 0

MHBO: Malignant hilar biliary obstruction; NA: Not available; MBO: Malignant biliary obstruction; CDS: Choledochoduodenostomy; HGS: Hepaticogastrostomy