Skip to main content
Germs logoLink to Germs
. 2020 Dec 28;10(4):295–302. doi: 10.18683/germs.2020.1221

Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospital acquired sepsis in pediatrics, relation to antibiotics, resistance and virulence genes

Maysaa Zaki 1, Sara Galeb 2, Abdel-Rahman Eid 3, Doaa Ahmed 4,*, Amna Mabrouk 5, Radwa Abdel Latif 6
PMCID: PMC7811860  PMID: 33489944

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes mecA, vanA, B, C and virulence genes Panton-Valentine Leucocidin (PVL) and fibronectin-binding protein (fnBPA) among S. aureus isolates from hospital-acquired sepsis from pediatric intensive care units.

Methods

The study was a retrospective cross-sectional study, including 250 unique isolates of S. aureus obtained from pediatric patients with hospital-acquired sepsis. The isolates were subjected to study of antibiotic susceptibility by disc diffusion method and molecular analysis of antibiotic resistance genes and certain virulence genes (PVL and fnBPA genes).

Results

Methicillin resistant S. aureus represented 178 (71%) of the isolated S. aureus and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin was detected by minimum inhibitory concentration in 39 (22%) isolates. It was found that there was a strong association between the MRSA strains and resistance to some antibiotics, devices association (p<0.001) and patient outcomes (p=0.003). There was a significant association between reduced vancomycin susceptibility (p=0.010), the presence of a central line catheter (p=0.000) and fnBPA gene (p<0.001) and mortality rate.

Conclusions

The present study highlights that major S. aureus strains isolated from sepsis in pediatric patients were methicillin resistant with a substantial proportion of reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Although none of the isolates had van genes responsible for vancomycin resistance, this finding warrants a considerable attention for study as it was a risk factor for mortality in those patients. The virulence genes fibronectin-binding protein and Panton-Valentine Leucocidin were not uncommon in S. aureus.

Keywords: S. aureus, mecA, van, fnBPA, PVL

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a widespread pathogen associated with multiple infections in both healthcare facilities as well as community-acquired infections. The pathogen is responsible for multiple infections ranging from infections of the soft tissues to serious invasive infections such as sepsis and pneumonia. Its pathogenicity is due to many factors such as the resistance to antibiotics, production of enzymes and toxins. Methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has been a significant concern in healthcare infections worldwide.1

Methicillin resistant S. aureus reflects the antibiotic resistance pattern of this species which simply reflects the resistance to betalactam antibiotics and limits the options available for antibiotic therapy. Methicillin resistance is due to the presence of mecA gene. MecA gene codes for the penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) which reduces the binding affinity for the betalactam antibiotics, even the penicillinase-resistant penicillin. The mecA gene, known as the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) is present on a mobile genetic element. The mecA gene complex has plasmids and transposons insertion sites which are associated with the development of resistance genes to other antibiotics.2

Many studies since 2002 until now reported the emergence of S. aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic that is reserved as an alternative treatment of MRSA.3 Two different resistance mechanisms were present, intermediate resistance to S. aureus that occurs as a result of thickening in the cell wall, where many vancomycin molecules were trapped within the cell wall. The trapped molecules block the meshwork of peptidoglycan and eventually create a physical barrier to more incoming molecules of vancomycin;4 these isolates are called vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) with MIC of 4–8 μg/mL.5 The second mechanism of resistance to vancomycin is due to the presence of vanA gene or other van resistance determinants, these isolates are called vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) with MIC ≥ 16 μg/mL.5

Among the virulence factors expressed by S. aureus are fibronectin-binding protein A (fnBPA) and fibronectin-binding protein B (fnBPs), which are important virulence factors that mediate its action via S. aureus adhesion to the fibronectin, fibrinogen and elastin.6 Additionally, fnBPA is known to be an important coating component for S. aureus in its internalization by nonprofessional phagocytic cells to be protected against immune response and antibiotic treatment, the process that is associated with serious infections and septic death.7

Another factor of virulence expressed by S. aureus is the Panton-Valentine Leucocidin (PVL), which is a leucotoxin that mediates the destruction of leukocytes and tissue necrosis, it is encoded by two genes, lukS-PV and lukF-PV.8

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of mecA, vanA, B, C antibiotic resistance genes and virulence genes Panton-Valentine Leucocidin (PVL) and fibronectin-binding protein (fnBPA) among S. aureus isolates from hospital-acquired sepsis of intensive-care units in pediatric patients.

Methods

Study design

The study was a retrospective cross-sectional study that included 250 unique isolates of S. aureus collected from pediatric patients from intensive care units, with hospital-acquired sepsis, from Mansoura University Children Hospital, Egypt, from January 2015 to March 2018. Hospital-acquired sepsis was diagnosed according to the center of disease control criteria.9 Their ages ranged between 20-65 months. The study was approved by the Mansoura ethical committee and approval to use isolates in future genetic studies of the microbes was received from each patient's parent.

Data collection

The resulting demographic and clinical data were obtained from the recorded electronic data system for each patient.

Bacterial isolates

Bacterial isolates were collected from each sample by standard microbiological techniques. S. aureus was identified by Gram stain, coagulase, catalase tests and mannitol fermentation.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

Antibiotic disc diffusion method was used to detect antibiotic susceptibility according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI).10 The antibiotic discs used were cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, amikacin, oxacillin, rifampin, tetracycline, sulfamethoxazole plus trimethoprim (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). Cefoxitin disc (30 μg) and oxacillin disc (1 μg) were used for the detection of methicillin-resistant isolates. Decreased susceptibility of the isolates to vancomycin was determined by observing the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by agar dilution according to the CLSI guidelines.10

Following the definition of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, S. aureus isolates with vancomycin MIC 4–8 µg/mL were classified as vancomycin intermediate S. aureus, and those with MIC ≥16 µg/mL were classified as vancomycin resistant S. aureus, and S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin with MIC from 2 μg/mL to 4 μg/mL.10

Detection of mecA, vanA, B, C, fnBPA, and PVL genes by PCR

DNA extraction

S. aureus was grown at 37°C for 18 hours on blood-agar plates. DNA was extracted by the use of DNeasy by Blood & Tissue Kit according to the manual procedures. Extracted DNA was kept frozen at -20°C before amplification procedures. The sequences of the primers used for all genes have been summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. The sequences used for the studied genes and the base pair (bp) of the amplified products.
Gene Sequences of the primers bp Reference
mecA F:5/-AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC-3\
R 5/-AGTTCTGGAGTACCGGATTTGC-3\
533 11
vanA F5/-ATGAATAGAATAAAAGTTGCAATAC
R 5/-CCCCTTTAACGCTAATACGAT
1029 12
vanB F: 5/-CCCGAATTTCAAATGATTGAAAA
R 5/-CGCCATCCTCCTGCAAAA
457 12
vanC F5/-GCTGAAATATGAAGTAATGACCA
R 5/-CGGCATGGTGTTGATTTCGTT
811 12
PVL Luks-PV: 5/AGTGAACTTATCTTTCTATTGAAAAACACTC-3\
Luks-PV: 5/-GCATCAASTGTATTGGATAGCAAAAGC-3\
433 13
fnBPA F: 5/-CACAACCAGCAAATATAG-3\
R: 5/-CTGTGTGGTAATCAATGTC-3\
1362 13

PCR detection of mecA

Amplification was achieved by using Qiagen ready to use mixture for amplification. A 1 µL volume of prepared DNA (0.5 µg) was applied to 25 µL PCR mixture with 0.7 µL of 0.8 µmol/L of each primer. The PCR thermal cycling protocol included first denaturation of 95°C for 3 min, followed by amplification for 33 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 53°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 6 min. Electrophoresis visualized the amplified products by staining with ethidium bromide and seen using UV transilluminator.11

PCR detection of vanA-C genes

The amplification was carried out using Qiagen amplification mixture. A 1 µL volume of prepared DNA (0.5 µg) was applied to 25 µL PCR mixture with 0.7 µL of 0.8 µmol/L of each primer. The PCR program consisted of initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min; followed by denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 82°C, 59°C, and 58°C for vanA, vanB and vanC respectively for 2 min, and DNA extension at 72°C for 2 min. The reaction was terminated for 6 min after the last cycle by incubation at 72°C and the products were deposited at 4°C. PCR products (5.0 μL) were analyzed with electrophoresis after staining with ethidium bromide and seen using UV transilluminator.12

PCR detection of PVL gene

The PCR program consisted of initial denaturation step at 94°C for 1 min; this was followed by denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, primers annealing at 50 for 1 min, and DNA extension at 72°C for 2 min. After the last cycle, the reaction was terminated by incubation at 72°C for 6 min. PCR products (5.0 μL) were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and made visible by ethidium bromide staining and UV transillumination.13

PCR detection of fnBPA gene

After amplification for 30 cycles (30 s of denaturation at 94°C, 30 s of annealing at 57°C, and 1 min of extension at 72°C. PCR products were analysed by electrophoresis through 0.8% agarose gel stained by ethidium bromide staining and UV transillumination.13

Control strains

The control strains were used for the laboratory tests. For biochemical identification and antibiotics test susceptibility by disc diffusion method, S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used. For PCR for PVL gene, S. aureus ATCC 49775 was used. For detection of fnBPA gene, S. aureus ATCC was used. For mecA gene detection by PCR, S. aureus ATCC 33591 was used.14

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed by the use of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPPS v24), (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The qualitative data were expressed as numbers and percentages and compared with the use of Chi-square test and p values were considered significant if <0.05. The quantitative data were analyzed as mean and standard deviation (SD). The risk factors assessment was measured by binary logistic regression and p values were considered significant if <0.05.

Results

The study included 250 children with mean age 39.9±13.1 months complaining of healthcare-acquired sepsis due to S. aureus.

The sepsis was diagnosed as primary sepsis with no obvious primary infection in 57% of the patients. The most frequent underlying disease was mainly renal diseases and diabetes mellitus (23% and 22% respectively), the mortality rate was 16% – Table 2.

Table 2. Demographic and clinical data of pediatric patients.

Total patients (n=250)
No. %
Gender
Male 123 49%
Female 127 51%
Age, months (mean±SD) 39.9 ± 13.1
Underlying etiology
Diabetes mellitus 54 22%
Renal diseases 57 23%
Respiratory infections 46 18%
Hepatic disorders 33 13%
Meningitis 17 7%
Malignancy 43 17%
Type of sepsis
Primary 141 56%
Secondary 109 44%
Type of device
Central venous line 57 23%
Ventilator 51 20%
Urinary catheter 142 57%
Patient outcome
Discharge 211 84%
Death 39 16%

Methicillin resistant S. aureus represented 178 (71%) of the isolated S. aureus and reduced sensitivity to vancomycin was detected by MIC in 39 (22%) isolates, data not shown.

The study of antibiotic resistance genes mecA and van genes revealed that mecA was detected in 71% of the isolated S. aureus while none of the isolated S. aureus had van genes. The prevalence of virulence genes was 24% for fnBPA and 4% for PVL.

The antibiotic resistance was more frequent among MRSA than non-MRSA strains and statistically significant increases were found in resistance to gentamicin (p=0.008) and clindamycin (p=0.013). There was a statistically significant increase in PVL (p=0.036) and statistically non-significant increase in fnBPA in MRSA than non-MRSA strains, (p=0.450). The most frequent devices associated with MRSA were urinary catheters and ventilators (p <0.001). Moreover, a significant statistical association with patient outcomes among MRSA strains (p=0.003) was seen – Table 3.

Table 3. Comparison between MRSA and non-MRSA regarding antibiotics resistance, device association and patient's outcome.

MRSA
(n=178)
Non-MRSA
(n=72)
Chi-square value df value 95% confidence interval P value
No % No % Lower bound Upper bound
Oxacillin 178 100 3 4 235.612 1 0.005 0.051 p<0.001
Gentamicin 42 24 7 10 6.261 1 1.222 6.729 0.008
Amikacin 40 22 19 26 0.436 1 0.430 1.520 0.307
Clindamycin 34 19 8 11 5.373 1 1.132 5.735 0.013
Vancomycin 39 22 10 14 2.093 1 0.816 3.707 0.100
Tetracycline 25 14 7 10 0.858 1 0.625 3.683 0.240
Erythromycin 35 20 11 15 0.657 1 0.647 2.847 0.268
Rifampicin 63 35 21 29 0.891 1 0.735 2.409 0.214
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 81 45 25 35 2.441 1 0.890 2.770 0.077
Ciprofloxacin 34 19 7 10 3.289 1 0.924 5.205 0.048
Cefoxitin 178 100 0 0 250.000 1 <0.001
fnBPA 44 46 19 26 0.076 1 0.490 1.711 0.450
PVL 4 2 6 8 4.945 1 0.069 0.925 0.036
Gender (male) 82 46 41 57 2.427 1 0.372 1.121 0.078
Device 19.269 2 <0.001
CLABSI 28 16 29 40
Ventilator 36 20 15 20
Urinary catheter 114 64 28 38
Outcome 0.003
Death 20 11 19 26
Discharge 158 89 53 73

CLABSI – central line-associated bloodstream infection.

There was a significant association between male gender (p=0.032), reduced vancomycin susceptibility (p=0.010), the presence of a central line catheter (p<0.001) and fnBPA gene (p<0.001) and mortality – Table 4.

Table 4. Study of demographic, clinical and microbiological risk factors associated with mortality.

Parameters Died (n=39)
No. % Odds ratio 95% confidence interval P value
Lower bound Upper bound
Gender
Male 24 62% 2.1 1.1 3.9 0.032
Reduced vancomycin sensitivity 16 41% 2.6 1.4 4.4 0.010
Device associated with sepsis
Central venous catheter versus other 25 64% 4.3 2.5 7.6 <0.001
mecA 30 77% 2.02 0.9 4.6 0.064
fnBPA 23 59% 4.3 2.4 7.5 <0.001
PVL 4 10% 2.7 1.2 6.2 0.058

Discussion

S. aureus has emerged as a major pathogen in invasive infections affecting hospitalized patients. There is unceasing rise of MRSA strains among these patients, thus, influencing proper empiric antibiotic choice and requiring longitudinal control.15

In the present study, strains resistant to methicillin represented 71% of the isolated S. aureus. Previous analysis about MRSA frequency among S. aureus isolates denoted that the rates ranged from 13 up to 74%.16 These wide variations could be justified by the difference in geographical area from one country to another, different risk factors and the degree compliance with guidelines of infection control within the health system.17

The current findings indicate that there is a higher frequency of resistance to commonly used antibiotics for S. aureus treatment. A statistically significant association was reported between MRSA strains and resistance to gentamicin (p=0.008) and clindamycin (p=0.013). These findings are in line with previous data claiming that MRSA strains have emerged with concomitant resistance to many commonly used antibiotics from groups like aminoglycosides, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline.18 Once a S. aureus isolate is characterized as an MRSA, it is instantly classified as multiple drug resistant infection as it will be non-susceptible to all categories of β-lactam such as all categories of penicillins, cephalosporins, β-lactamase inhibitors, and carbapenems.19

The best antibiotic of choice for treatment of MRSA is vancomycin. However, there are reports about the emergence of intermediate resistance to vancomycin.4 The standard method for determination of vancomycin susceptibility is by MIC as accepted by Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute.10

Using MIC to assess S. aureus susceptibility to vancomycin showed reduced susceptibility in 39 (22%) isolates. This was consistent with a previous study; it reported that 21.2% of isolated S. aureus had intermediate resistance to vancomycin.20 Inappropriate long-term vancomycin usage leads to gene mutation which results in changes in the thickness of the cell wall of S. aureus, that may be associated with reduced sensitivity to vancomycin.21 Nevertheless; the present data showed that none of the isolates had van genes. This result was in agreement with a previous study that evaluated the rare existence of van genes among the clinical isolates of S. aureus.22

Moreover, the frequency of virulence genes in the present study was found to be 24% for fnBPA and 4% for PVL. These findings are different from a previous study done in Saudi Arabia on 50 clinical isolates, it reported lack of PVL gene and lower prevalence of fnBPA gene (8%).14 This may be owed to the fact that PVL is a common gene in S. aureus isolated from community-acquired infections, with a lower prevalence in S. aureus isolated from hospital-acquired infections.22 It was found that its presence is statistically significant especially with MRSA strains (p=0.036). This finding came in agreement with other studies that focused on the spread of PVL positive MRSA strains in hospital-acquired infections.23

Furthermore, the invasive process of infection associated with S. aureus needs the presence of fibronectin-binding proteins that act as S. aureus invasins and the deletion of the gene encoding fnBPA in invasive laboratory strains, leading to a decrease in the invasive ability of these strains.24

The current results showed that the mortality rate reached 16% of the enrolled cases. This was comparable to an earlier study among children suffering from sepsis, which found the rate to reach 13%.25 Generally, the mortality rate from sepsis may vary according to different factors such as the gender, the development of septic shock and multiple organ dysfunctions and the etiological pathogen of the disease (especially antibiotic-resistant bacteria) and the presence of comorbidities affect the prognosis and explain the differences from one place to another.26

Male gender was one of the risk factors for mortality in the present study showing statistical significance (p=0.032). There was previous assumption regarding the sexual dimorphism in the immune responses to the infection that may have an impact on the mortality as the androgens may have immunosuppressive effects.27 Whether this hypothesis is applicable in children or not, needs further studies.

The other risk factors for grave outcomes were the association with central venous catheter (p<0.001). This is a well-known risk factor for invasive S. aureus infection and bacteremia.28 Moreover, there was an evident association between mortality and reduced sensitivity to vancomycin (p=0.010). This agreed with a previous study that demonstrated this association of reduced sensitivity to vancomycin in S. aureus and severe complications of sepsis.29 Consistently, in the present study, the presence of fnBPA gene was found to be associated with mortality (p<0.001). Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Conclusions

The present study highlights that major S. aureus strains isolated from sepsis in pediatric patients were methicillin resistant with a considerable proportion of these isolates with reduced sensitivity to vancomycin. Although none of the isolates had van genes responsible for vancomycin resistance, this finding warrants a considerable attention for study as it was a risk factor for mortality in those patients. The virulence genes fibronectin-binding protein and Panton-Valentine Leucocidin were not uncommon in S. aureus. This finding can be placed under more investigation to be used as a useful strategy in developing new treatment or vaccine for S. aureus infections. But also, prospective studies and continuous surveillance are needed to support these finding.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants and other healthcare workers who helped all through the process of the research.

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions statement: MZ designed the research plan, organized the study and participated in the main role of editing and revising the manuscript. SG, ARE, RAL carried out all laboratory tests and coordinated the data analysis. AM collected and supervised all clinical issues of patients. The corresponding author is DA and had a major contribution in writing of the manuscript and had a role in follow up of all steps of the study. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest: All authors – none to declare.

Funding: None to declare.

References

  • 1.Haque M, Sartelli M, McKimm J, Abu Bakar M. Health care-associated infections - an overview. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;15:2321–33. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S177247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gebremariam TT, Zelelow YB. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Saudi J Health Sci. 2014;3:71–4. doi: 10.4103/2278-0521.134848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McGuinness WA, Malachowa N, DeLeo FR. Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Yale J Biol Med. 2017;90:269–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thati V, Shivannavar CT, Gaddad SM. Vancomycin resistance among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from intensive care units of tertiary care hospitals in Hyderabad. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134:704–8. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.91001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cong Y, Yang S, Rao X. Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review of case updating and clinical features. J Adv Res. 2019;12;21:169–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shinji H, Yosizawa Y, Tajima A, et al. Role of fibronectin binding proteins A and B in in vitro cellular infections and in vivo septic infections by Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2011;79:2215–23. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00133-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fraunholz M, Sinha B. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus: live-in and let die. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;34:43. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gijón M, Bellusci M, Petraitiene B, et al. Pediatric community-acquired bone and joint Staphylococcus aureus infections in Europe: severe infections are associated to Panton-Valentine leucocidin presence. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39:e73–6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/ National Healthcare Safety Network. CDC/NHSN Surveillance Definitions of Healthcare-Associated Infection and Criteria for Specific Types of Infections. in the Acute Care Setting, CDC/NHSN Protocol Corrections, Clarification, and Additions. HAI Definitions; (17)1-12. January 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, CLSI. Wayne, Philadelphia, PA: CLSI; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pournajat A, Ardebili A, Goudarzi L, et al. PCR-based identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains and their antibiotic resistance profiles. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4:S293–7. doi: 10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abulreesh HH. Absence of vancomycin-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from potable water. J Public Health Epidemiol. 2014;6:70–5. doi: 10.5897/JPHE2013.0606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Netsvyetayeva I, Fraczek M, Piskorska K, et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in Ukraine: antibacterial resistance and virulence factor encoding genes. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abulreesh HH, Organji SR, Osman GEH, Elbanna K, Almalki MHK, Ahmad I. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance and virulence factors encoding genes in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Saudi Arabia. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017;5:196–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:285–92. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hassoun A, Linden PK, Friedman B. Incidence, prevalence, and management of MRSA bacteremia across patient populations-a review of recent developments in MRSA management and treatment. Crit Care. 2017;21:211. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1801-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vaez H, Tabaraei A, Moradi A, Ghaemi E. Evaluation of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients in Golestan province-north of Iran. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2011;5:432–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S21: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2012; 32. 21st Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dubey D, Rath S, Sahu M, Pattnaik L, Debata NK, Padhy RN. Surveillance of infection status of drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an Indian teaching hospital. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2013;3:133–42. doi: 10.1016/S2222-1808(13)60057-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Park JW, Lee H, Kim JW, Kim B. Characterization of infections with vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility in South Korea. Sci Rep. 2019;17:9:6236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42307-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gardete S, Tomasz A. Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:2836–40. doi: 10.1172/JCI68834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sun DD, Ma XX, Hu J, et al. Epidemiological and molecular characterization of community and hospital acquired Staphylococcus aureus strains prevailing in Shenyang, Northeastern China. Braz J Infect Dis. 2013;17:682–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2013.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shore AC, Tecklenborg SC, Brennan GI, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Coleman DC. Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus in Ireland from 2002 to 2011: 21 clones, frequent importation of clones, temporal shift of predominant methicillin-resistant S. aureus clones, and increasing multi-resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:859–70. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02799-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gries CM, Biddle T, Bose JL, Kielian T, Lo DD. Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin binding protein A mediates biofilm development and infection. Infect Immun. 2020;88:e00859–19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00859-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Holland TL, Arnold C, Fowler VG., Jr Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review. JAMA. 2014;312:1330–41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Randolph AG, McCulloh RJ. Pediatric sepsis: important considerations for diagnosing and managing severe infections in infants, children, and adolescents. Virulence. 2014;5:179–89. doi: 10.4161/viru.27045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Trigunaite A, Dimo J, Jørgensen TN. Suppressive effects of androgens on the immune system. Cell Immunol. 2015;294:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thomer L, Schneewind O, Missiakas D. Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections. Annu Rev Pathol. 2016;11:343–64. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sullivan SB, Austin ED, Stump S, et al. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus has no significant impact on mortality but results in an increase in complicated infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00316–17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00316-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Germs are provided here courtesy of European Academy of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Diseases

RESOURCES