Abstract
Objectives
Although nationally representative data are helpful in designing strategies and policies of programmes in a country, there is paucity of evidence with regard to trends and factors influencing utilisation of long-acting contraceptives (LACs). Thus, this study aimed to assess the trends and factors influencing LAC utilisation among contraceptive users in Ethiopia.
Design
A repeated cross-sectional study.
Setting and participants
The Performance Monitoring and Accountability (PMA2020) national community-based survey data were used, and 2035 contraceptive users participated. To identify trends, proportions of LAC users were analysed using PMA data from round 1 in January 2014 to round 6 in July 2018.
Main outcome measures
Users using LAC methods or otherwise.
Results
There was a difference in trends in LAC utilisation in the last 4.5 years. There was a 7% increase in the proportion of implant users, while there were no significant changes in utilisation of intrauterine device and female sterilisation. Women in the middle wealth quintile were 1.7 times more likely than those in the lowest quintile to use LAC, while contraceptive users who received recommendations from healthcare providers as well as those who made decisions jointly with healthcare providers were more likely to use LAC compared with those who decided on their own. Women with access to their desired method of contraception were less likely to use LAC, while those informed about intrauterine contraceptive device were more likely to use LAC compared with their counterparts. Women served at health posts, private hospitals and others (family planning clinics, pharmacies and non-governmental organisations) were less likely to use LAC compared with women served at public hospitals.
Conclusion
Overall the utilisation of LAC in Ethiopia is low. Therefore, much has to be done in terms of raising awareness about intrauterine device, how healthcare providers can help users in choosing contraceptive methods, and sharing of experiences between public hospitals and other family planning service delivery points.
Keywords: trends, long-acting contraceptive, reproductive-age women, utilisation, Ethiopia
Strengths and limitations of this study.
The study used country-level data, which are more representative.
The study presents up-to-date data as the data were collected on an annual basis compared with data from demographic health surveys.
The study used short time series data of only 4.5 years to analyse trends.
It is difficult to establish in a survey the cause–effect relationship between response and explanatory variables.
Introduction
Long-acting contraceptives (LACs) are modern family planning methods that help prevent pregnancy for 3 or more years. Intrauterine contraceptive devices, implants, and female and male sterilisation methods are among the popular LAC methods used in Ethiopia.1 They are safe, cost-effective and convenient for users and are associated with lower rates of failure compared with short-acting methods such as contraceptive pills, injectables and condoms.2
Globally, 62% of married women aged 15–49 years use a family planning method to limit and space childbirth. However, the prevalence rate of use of contraceptives varies significantly between women living in high-income countries (67%) and those living in low-income countries (34%). Likewise, huge disparity is observed in different countries, ranging from 4% in South Sudan to 88% in Norway.3 Despite variations in the overall prevalence rate of use of contraceptives, LAC methods were used by about a quarter (27%) of modern contraceptive users worldwide.4 Additionally, the utilisation of LAC is low in Sub-Saharan Africa and the region has predominantly relied on short-term family planning methods over the past 30 years.5
Evidence shows that it is difficult for women to use oral contraceptives correctly and consistently. Unintended pregnancy and its consequences happen from faulty use of oral contraceptives each year in the world.6–10 Therefore, by enhancing effective use of LAC and tackling barriers to its use, the world could avert more than 54 million unintended pregnancies, 79 000 maternal mortalities and 1 million infant deaths each year.11 In the developing world, 72 million unintended pregnancies occur annually, 30% of which resulted from faulty use of contraceptives.12
Ethiopia is one of the three African countries contributing to high maternal mortality in the world. In 2012, the region averted 25.2% of maternal deaths through family planning methods.13 The utilisation of contraceptives was highly skewed towards use of short-term methods in Ethiopia despite the lower rate of failure and the effectiveness of LAC. Even though the Ethiopian Ministry of Health is working on the provision of modern contraceptive methods at the lowest service delivery points (SDPs) to make them accessible at a lower or at no cost, the country’s utilisation of LAC is low.14 For instance, the rates of utilisation of permanent family planning methods, intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants were less than 1%, 2% and 8% among women of childbearing age, respectively.15
Previous research has focused on local factors affecting LAC utilisation in different areas of the country despite the need to analyse nationally representative data to provide a clear understanding of the overall factors influencing utilisation. In addition, up-to-date evidence on the trends and determinants of LAC utilisation is crucial in designing family planning strategies and policies to get the benefits of family planning, especially the advantages of contraceptive method mix. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the trends in the last 4.5 years and the factors influencing LAC utilisation in Ethiopia.
Methods
Study context
A secondary data analysis was conducted using Performance Monitoring and Accountability (PMA2020) survey data, a nationally representative, community-based, cross-sectional study of Ethiopian family planning programmes. All women of childbearing age (15–49 years old) who were using any method of contraceptives in Ethiopia were included in the analysis.
Data source and study period
The PMA2020 survey collects data at the national level to estimate key indicators in order to monitor progress in family planning both at the population and SDP level. The resident enumerator model enables replication of surveys on an annual basis or more frequently. The PMA2020 round 6 project was obtained from https://www.pmadata.org/countries/ethiopia/ethiopia-indicators/pma2018ethiopia-round-6-indicators.
The study was conducted in six rounds: round 1: January–March 2014; round 2: October–December 2014; round 3: April–May 2015; round 4: March–April 2016; round 5: April–May 2017; and round 6: June–July 2018.
Sampling design
PMA2020/Ethiopia used a two-stage cluster design, with urban–rural major regions as strata. This survey round used the same 221 enumeration areas (EA) (sampling unit) used for all rounds by the Central Statistical Agency from its master sampling frame. Thirty-five households were selected from each EA, and households with eligible women of reproductive age (15–49 years) were contacted for interviews.
Once listed, 35 households were randomly selected by field supervisors using a phone-based, random number-generating application. All occupants in the selected households were enumerated, and from this list all eligible women aged 15–49 years were approached and asked to provide informed consent to participate in the study. Of the 7429 women interviewed, 2035 reported using contraceptive methods for PMA2020 round 6. The final weighted sample size was therefore 2035 contraceptive users.
Data collection tool
PMA2020 used a standardised questionnaire to gather data about households, individual women and SDPs that are comparable across programme countries and consistent with existing national surveys. It is a comprehensive questionnaire that includes sociodemographic variables, reproductive characteristics, SDPs and contraceptive behaviours. Prior to launching the survey in each country, public health experts from Addis Ababa University reviewed and modified the questionnaire to ensure that all questions were appropriate to each setting. The questionnaire was then translated into three local languages.
Data collection procedures
Fieldwork training started with a 2-week training of new field staff, followed by a 3-hour refresher training for returning field staff before actual data collection. Unlike traditional paper and pencil surveys, PMA2020 uses Open Data Kit (ODK) Collect, an open-source software application, to collect data on mobile phones. All questionnaires were programmed using this software and installed on all project smartphones. The ODK questionnaire forms are programmed with automatic skip patterns and built-in response constraints to reduce data entry errors.
This instantaneous aggregation of data also allowed for concurrent data processing and course corrections while PMA2020 was still active in the field. Throughout data collection, the central staff at Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia and the data manager from the Gates Institute in Baltimore, Maryland routinely monitored incoming data and notified the field staff of any potential errors, missing data or problems found with form submissions on the central server.
Data analysis
Once all data were on the server, the data analysts cleaned and de-identified the data, applied survey weights, and prepared the final data set for analysis using STATA V.14 software. Survey data were declared using the ‘svy’ command to perform variance estimation that accounts for multiple stages of clustered sampling, and weighting of the sample was applied before running the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used for trend analysis, and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were employed to determine factors influencing LAC utilisation. Finally, statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Operational definition
LAC utilisation refers to a woman currently using either IUD, implant or female sterilisation method.
Patient and public involvement
No patients were involved in the design of the study.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics of contraceptive users in Ethiopia
A total of 7429 women were interviewed for the study, yielding a response rate of 97.5%. Of the women interviewed, 27.9% reported they were using contraceptives. The mean (95% CI) age of women was 28.9 (28.6 to 29.2) years. As shown in table 1, 91.4% were married. With regard to educational status, 39.5% of the respondents reached primary school, followed by 38.4% who never attended formal education and 12.4% who attended secondary school (table 1).
Table 1.
Sociodemographic characteristics of contraceptive users in Ethiopia in 2018
| Variables | Categories | Unweighted number (n=2035) | Weighted number (n=2073) | Weighted percentage |
| Age | 15–19 | 134 | 146 | 7.0 |
| 20–24 | 415 | 405 | 19.5 | |
| 25–29 | 564 | 540 | 26.16 | |
| 30–34 | 405 | 403 | 19.4 | |
| 35–39 | 312 | 342 | 16.5 | |
| 40–44 | 149 | 172 | 8.3 | |
| 45–49 | 56 | 65 | 3.1 | |
| Marital status | Married | 1773 | 1895 | 91.4 |
| Divorced or widowed | 117 | 91 | 4.4 | |
| Never married | 145 | 87 | 4.2 | |
| Education | Never attended | 569 | 797 | 38.4 |
| Primary | 747 | 816 | 39.5 | |
| Secondary | 288 | 257 | 12.4 | |
| Technical/vocational | 201 | 131 | 6.3 | |
| Higher education | 130 | 72 | 3.4 | |
| Wealth quintile | Lowest | 201 | 345 | 16.6 |
| Lower | 223 | 379 | 18.3 | |
| Middle | 212 | 338 | 16.3 | |
| Higher | 414 | 455 | 21.9 | |
| Highest | 985 | 556 | 26.8 | |
| Administrative regions | Tigray | 273 | 107 | 5.2 |
| Afar | 20 | 7 | 0.3 | |
| Amhara | 431 | 631 | 30.4 | |
| Oromia | 445 | 705 | 34.0 | |
| Somali | 16 | 7 | 0.3 | |
| Benishangul Gumuz | 43 | 33 | 1.6 | |
| SNNP | 511 | 461 | 22.3 | |
| Gambela | 20 | 9 | 0.4 | |
| Harari | 12 | 4 | 0.2 | |
| Addis Ababa | 247 | 101 | 4.9 | |
| Diredawa | 17 | 8 | 0.3 |
SNNP, Southern natiions, nationalities, and peoples.
Trends of LAC utilisation among contraceptive users in Ethiopia
The overall prevalence of LAC utilisation in Ethiopia was 7.6% among married and unmarried women (those engaged in sexual activities) and 11.0% among married women (figure 1).
Figure 1.
Overall trends in long-acting contraceptive use among all women of reproductive age in Ethiopia. IUD, intrauterine device; PMA, Performance monitoring and Accountability.
LAC utilisation did not show significant improvement in the last 4.5 years since January 2014. Only 27% of the current users were using LAC. Among the current users in Ethiopia, there was a difference in trends in LAC utilisation during the last 4.5 years. It was 20.0% in January 2014, 23.7% in November 2014, 24.8% in May 2015, 26.2% in April 2016 and 26.4% in May 2017. Implant utilisation showed good progress in the last 4.5 years, with an increment of 7 percentage points, while there were no significant changes in utilisation of IUD and female sterilisation (figure 2).
Figure 2.

Trends in long-acting contraceptive (LAC) use among contraceptive users in Ethiopia. PMA, Performance Monitoring and Accountability.
Factors influencing LAC utilisation among contraceptive users in Ethiopia in 2018
After controlling for confounding effects using multivariable logistic regression, factors influencing LAC utilisation among contraceptive users in Ethiopia were determined as household wealth status, final say about contraceptive use, SDPs, having access to desired contraceptive and being informed about IUD.
SDPs significantly influenced LAC utilisation. Women served at health posts (adjusted OR (AOR) 0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5), private hospitals (AOR 0.1, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.24) and others (family planning clinics, pharmacies and non-governmental organisations) (AOR 0.1, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.2) were 71%, 90% and 88% less likely to use LAC compared with those who received contraceptive services at public hospitals, respectively (table 2).
Table 2.
Multivariable analysis of LAC utilisation among contraceptive users in Ethiopia
| Variables | LAC utilisation | |||
| Yes (%) (n=565) |
No (%) (n=1508) |
COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
| Service delivery points | ||||
| Public hospital | 48 (8.5) | 46 (3.3) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Public health centre | 358 (63.5) | 497 (36.0) | 0.68 (0.4 to 1.1) | 0.80 (0.5 to 1.3) |
| Health post | 119 (21.0) | 440 (31.9) | 0.25 (0.1 to 0.4)† | 0.29 (0.1 to 0.5)† |
| Private hospital | 19 (3.3) | 224 (16.2) | 0.07 (0.0 to 0.2)† | 0.10 (0.0 to 0.2)† |
| Others‡ | 21 (3.6) | 173 (12.5) | 0.11 (0.0 to 0.2)† | 0.12 (0.1 to 0.2)† |
| Final say about contraceptive use | ||||
| Self | 247 (43.9) | 911 (56.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Provider only | 65 (11.5) | 18 (1.3) | 11.2 (5.4 to 23.1)† | 6.4 (2.5 to 16.2)† |
| Partner only | 19 (3.1) | 49 (3.6) | 1.1 (0.6 to 2.2) | 1.08 (0.5 to 2.2) |
| With provider | 53 (9.5) | 59 (9.5) | 2.9 (1.6 to 5.0)† | 2.13 (1.1 to 4.2)* |
| With partner | 181 (32.0) | 471 (4.3) | 1.21 (0.9 to 1.6) | 1.27 (0.9 to 1.7) |
| Parity | 565 (27.3) | 1508 (72.7) | 1.06 (1.0 to 1.1)* | 1.06 (1.0 to 1.1) |
| Wealth quintile | ||||
| Lowest | 76 (13.4) | 269 (17.9) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Lower | 103 (18.2) | 276 (18.3) | 1.3 (0.8 to 2.1) | 1.2 (0.7 to 2.0) |
| Middle | 120 (21.3) | 218 (14.4) | 1.9 (1.2 to 3.1)* | 1.7 (1.0 to 2.9)* |
| Higher | 113 (20.1) | 341 (22.6) | 1.2 (0.8 to 1.8) | 1.1 (0.7 to 1.8) |
| Highest | 153 (26.9) | 404 (26.8) | 1.3 (0.9 to 1.9) | 1.5 (0.9 to 1.7) |
| Obtained desired contraceptives | ||||
| Yes | 487 (86.3) | 1362 (98.7) | 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1)† | 0.1 (0.0 to 0.3)† |
| No | 77 (13.7) | 17 (1.3) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Heard about intrauterine device | ||||
| Yes | 416 (73.7) | 936 (62.1) | 1.7 (1.3 to 2.3)† | 1.8 (1.3 to 2.5)† |
| No | 148 (26.3) | 572 (37.9) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Media exposure to contraceptives | ||||
| Yes | 255 (45.2) | 653 (43.4) | 1.1 (0.8 to 1.4) | 1.1 (0.8 to 1.5) |
| No | 309 (54.7) | 852 (56.6) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Adjusted for age, marital status, educational status, administrative region, wealth, parity, gravidity, number of living children, ever hearing of contraceptives, method preferences and media exposure.
Reference category: 1.0.
*Family planning clinics, pharmacies and non-governmental organisations.
†Statistically significant at p<0.05.
‡Statistically significant at p<0.001.
AOR, adjusted OR; COR, crude OR; LAC, long-acting contraceptive.
The decision-making process shows a statistically significant association with LAC use. Women whose method of contraception was decided by their healthcare providers only were more than six times likely (AOR 6.4, 95% CI 2.5 to 16.2) to use LAC, while women who decided jointly with their healthcare providers were more than twice likely (AOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.2) to use LAC compared with those who decided on their own (table 2).
Although contraceptives were provided freely in public health facilities of the country, women of middle wealth status were nearly two times more likely (AOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.9) to use LAC compared with those in the lowest wealth category. Respecting only clients’ desire was found to have a negative effect on the utilisation of LAC. Women with access to their desired method of contraception were 88% less likely (AOR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.3) to use LAC than their counterparts. Finally, being informed about intrauterine contraceptive devices shows a statistically significant association with LAC utilisation. Women informed about intrauterine contraceptive devices were nearly twice more likely (AOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5) to use LAC than their counterparts (table 2).
Discussion
Determining the trends and status of LAC utilisation is decisive in showing the progress of the country and in comparing the status with that of other countries as well as worldwide at large. Thus this study aimed to show the trends and predictors of LAC utilisation.
In this study a steady increase in LAC utilisation in the country was observed. This finding lends acceptance to the existing literature regarding the heavy reliance on short-acting contraceptive methods.16–18 The finding indicates that only 27.1% of modern contraceptive users in Ethiopia used LAC. Among the LACs, contraceptive implants (23.7%) were the most frequently used, followed by IUD (2.3%) and sterilisation (1.3%). These findings are consistent with the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS).15 It implies that much has to be done in improving IUD services and permanent methods of contraception. The national reproductive health strategy also supports this finding and the plan was to increase the use of long-acting reversible and permanent contraceptive methods to 50% by 2020.14 The study also found that women who received services from health posts, private hospitals and others are less likely to use LAC than those who visited government hospitals for family planning services. This finding is similar to studies performed in the Tigray regional state of Northern Ethiopia.19 This might be because provision of LAC services requires skills and expertise, which were not consistent across different SDPs.
Women’s autonomy was found to be a statistically significant factor influencing the use of LAC in Ethiopia. Women who received healthcare providers’ recommendation and jointly decided with healthcare providers on the method of contraception were more likely to use LAC as compared with those who decided on their own. This finding is similar to studies performed in Western Ethiopia.20 21 During such discussions, there is counselling and information sharing about family planning, including LACs, which are important to correct myths and misconceptions related to LACs. In addition, it raises awareness about the importance of various options for LAC so that clients can decide on their preferred family planning method. In addition, where providers were the only ones who decide on the choice of family planning method, women use LACs at a higher rate compared with those who decide on their own. A possible explanation for this is that healthcare providers are experts on the pros and cons of LACs. Since LACs are more effective and have a lower rate of failure, healthcare providers might choose this option for women based on their health status.
The wealth index is another significant predictor of LAC utilisation. Women in the middle economic class are more likely to use LACs compared with those in the lower class. This is consistent with studies done in Ethiopia that used EDHS 2016 data.22 The possible explanation for this can be coupled to upgrading the economic status for preparedness and readiness to generate more income. This finding is in contrast to studies done in the town of Assosa in Western Ethiopia and in Zambia,20 21 23 and this discrepancy might be explained by methodological differences.
Having access to their desired method of contraceptives is one of the predictors of not using LACs. This finding is in line with studies performed in the USA, Uganda and Russia.24–26 This is because women of reproductive age are more inclined to use short-acting modern contraceptives, and the myths and misconceptions related to LAC make it a less preferred choice of contraceptive. Therefore, women are less likely to use LAC.
In this study, being informed about IUD was positively associated with utilisation of LACs. This finding is in line with studies conducted in the towns of Arba Minch and Jinka in Southern Ethiopia and in Amhara Region in Northern Ethiopia, and a study using EDHS 2016 data in the western region of Gambia.22 27–29 Being informed about the issue or being aware of it helps women make a decision with regard to LAC utilisation. However, the utilisation of IUD is very low despite available knowledge. This might be due to myths or misconceptions, discomfort, or wrong expectations about future infertility, which can hinder utilisation of IUD. Lastly, being informed about contraceptives through mass media has no statistical significance in influencing women’s use of LAC. This is supported by studies performed in Western and Southern Ethiopia.20 30 This might be due to women in Ethiopia were busy for gender roles to follow mass medias.
The implication of these findings supports the national reproductive health strategy that focuses on a rights-based approach. It is a reproductive right to obtain adequate information about appropriate family planning methods from health professionals. Thus, it will be essential to improve the quality of family planning counselling and services and bring a well-informed decision-making process on the choice of family planning method. Since Ethiopia is a low-resource country, improved utilisation of LAC can reduce healthcare burden, improve productivity and impact on the economic growth of the country. Moreover, this should be a priority area of the country in order to achieve universal healthcare coverage to meet the sustainable development goals.
Recommendation
More actions should be taken to raise awareness among all women in the community on the importance of informed decision-making when choosing contraceptive methods, as well as to improve provider–client communication through effective counselling. The private sector should be encouraged to play a bigger role in the provision of family planning services. Additionally, the government should strengthen the public–private SDP partnership in sharing public hospital experiences and skills in providing LAC services and enhance the quality of LAC services at lower delivery points. Finally, it is recommended that further operational research be performed using a qualitative approach to address untouched areas such as sociocultural factors.
Conclusion
Only approximately 1 in 10 married women of reproductive age and 8 out of 100 women of reproductive age used LAC. Much has to be done in raising awareness about IUD, how healthcare providers can help users in choosing contraceptive methods, and sharing of experiences between public hospitals and other family planning SDPs. However, mass media was insignificant in this study. Socioeconomic factors and gender roles should also be taken into account when designing different family planning strategies in Ethiopia.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) and Addis Ababa University School of Public Health.
Footnotes
Contributions: AT made substantial contribution to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. MB has been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding: The study was funded by PMA2020 project.
Disclaimer: The funding body has no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent for publication: Not required.
Ethics approval: Ethical clearance was obtained by Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) from the Addis Ababa University School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (IRB).
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement: Data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
- 1.World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and, Research (WHO/RHR), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs (CCP) Knowledge for Health Project . Family planning a global Handbook for providers (2018 update. Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO, 2018. https://www.fphandbook.org/sites/default/files/global-handbook-2018-full-web.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 2.USAID Family planning in Ethiopia [Internet], 2012. Available: https://www.healthpolicyproject.com/pubs/93_EthiopiaFPAugust.pdf
- 3.Population Reference Bureau (PRB) Family Planning Data Sheet [Internet], 2019. Available: https://www.prb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/fp-data-sheet-2019.pdf
- 4.United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division World Family Planning [Internet]. World Family Planning 2017 -Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/414), 2017. Available: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/WFP2017_Highlights.pdf
- 5.Ngo T, Nuccio O, Reiss K. Expanding long-acting and permanent contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa to meet FP2020 goals. London: Marie Stopes International, Research brief series, 2013: 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nyarko SH. Unintended pregnancy among pregnant women in Ghana: prevalence and predictors. J Pregnancy 2019;2019:1–8. 10.1155/2019/2920491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ali S, Abrejo F. The relationship between contraceptive use and unintended pregnancies among married women in Thatta district, Pakistan. J Midwifery Reprod Heal 2017;5:950–7. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang H, Long L, Cai H, et al. Contraception and unintended pregnancy among unmarried female university students: a cross-sectional study from China. PLoS One 2015;10:1–11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0130212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mayondi GK, Wirth K, Morroni C. Unintended pregnancy, contraceptive use, and childbearing desires among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women in Botswana: Across-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2016;16:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bradley SEK, Croft TN, Rutstein SO. The impact of contraceptive failure on unintended births and induced abortions: estimates and strategies for reduction. DHS analytical studies No. 22. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bongaarts J, Cleland J, das Gmonica. Family Planning Programs for the 21st Century: Rationale and Design In: Population studies. 67, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Polis CB, Bradley SEK, Bankole A, et al. Typical-use contraceptive failure rates in 43 countries with demographic and health survey data: summary of a detailed report. Contraception 2016;94:11–17. 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ahmed S, Li Q, Liu L, et al. Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012;67:685–6. 10.1097/01.ogx.0000423181.64758.aa [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) [Ethiopia] National Reeproductive health strategy 2016-2020. Addis Ababa, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 16.United Nation Department of Economic and Social Affairs Trends in contraceptive use worldwide 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsui AO, Brown W, Li Q. Contraceptive practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Dev Rev 2017;43:166–91. 10.1111/padr.12051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ahmed S, Choi Y, Rimon JG, et al. Trends in contraceptive prevalence rates in sub-Saharan Africa since the 2012 London Summit on family planning: results from repeated cross-sectional surveys. Lancet Glob Health 2019;7:e904–11. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30200-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gebremariam A, Addissie A. Modern contraceptive method mix and factors affecting utilization of modern contraceptives among married women in Adigrat town, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Fam Med Med Sci Res 2014;3 10.4172/2327-4972.1000139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Melka AS, Beyene TT, Tesso DW, Tekelab T, Wirtu D. Determinants of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods utilization among married women of reproductive age groups in Western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J 2015;21:1–10. 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.246.5835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Teresa A, Tura G, Alemu T. Determinants of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Method Utilization among Married Women in Assosa Town in Western Ethiopia : A Case-Control Study. J midwifery Reprod Heal 2019;1. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wado YD, Gurmu E, Tilahun T, et al. Contextual influences on the choice of long-acting reversible and permanent contraception in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. PLoS One 2019;14:1–17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0209602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mutombo N, Bakibinga P. The effect of joint contraceptive decisions on the use of injectables, long-acting and permanent methods (ILAPMs) among married female (15–49) contraceptive users in Zambia: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health 2014;11:1–8. 10.1186/1742-4755-11-51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hubacher D, Spector H, Monteith C. Reports of Major Impact short-acting methods : a randomized patient preference trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:101–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.LeevanTibaijuka RO, Welikhe E, Mukisa W. Factors influencing use of long-acting versus short-acting contraceptive methods among reproductive-age women in a resource-limited setting. BMC womens Heal 2017:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dasari M, Borrero S, Akers AY, et al. Barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptive uptake among homeless young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016;29:104–10. 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nejimu Biza MA, Surender Reddy P. Long acting reversible contraceptive use and associated factors among contraceptive users in Amhara region. Med Res Chron 2017;4. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mekonnen G, Enquselassie F, Tesfaye G, et al. Prevalence and factors affecting use of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods in Jinka town, southern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Pan Afr Med J 2014;18:1–8. 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.98.3421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gultie T, Hailu D, Workineh Y. Predictors of long acting contraceptives utilization among reproductive age women in Arba Minch Zuria district, Ethiopia. Qual Prim Care 2016;24:17–22. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Belayneh F, Abreha S, Meskele M. Knowledge, attitude and factors associated with the use of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age in Gesuba town, southern Ethiopia. J Biol Agric Healthc 2015;5:15–22. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

