Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;238(2):489–507. doi: 10.1111/joa.13309

TABLE 3.

Comparison of aqueous‐based tissue clearing

Method Clearing capability Tissue size DiI Compatible TEM Compatible Tissue validation References
Simple immersion
SeeDB Weak Constant Yes yes Mouse hemi‐brain clearing Ke et al., 2013
FRUIT Medium Constant Yes N.T. Whole adult rabbit Brain clearing Hou et al., 2015
ClearT/T2 Weak Constant Yes N.T. Young mouse brain clearing Kuwajima et al., 2013
RTF Medium Constant Yes N.T. Adult mouse brain blocks clearing Yu et al., 2018
Delipidation
FACT Strong Minor shrinkage No No Whole adult mouse brain clearing Xu et al., 2017
SeeDB2 Medium Constant Yes No Mouse hemi‐brain clearing Ke et al., 2016
FOCM Strong Constant yes N.T. Mouse hemi‐brain clearing Zhu et al., 2019
Ce3D Strong

Minor

shrinkage

N.T. N.T. Whole lymph node clearing Li et al., 2017
Hydration/delipidation
Scale weak expansion N.T. yes Adult mouse brain section clearing Hama et al., 2011
ScaleS Strong

Transient

expansion

yes yes Mouse hemi‐brain clearing Hama et al., 2015
CUBIC Strong Expansion no no

Whole adult mouse

Brain clearing

Susaki et al., 2014
Updated CUBIC Very strong Expansion no no

Whole adult mouse

Body clearing

Tainaka et al., 2018
UbasM Strong Expansion yes N.T. Mouse hemi‐brain clearing Chen et al., 2017

Abbreviations: N.T., not tested; TEM, transmission electron microscope.