Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec;8(24):1647. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7181

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparisons of functional markers between TNFR2+Tregs and TNFR2-Tregs in MPE. (A) Gating strategy for identifying TNFR2hi, TNFR2low, and TNFR2neg in CD4+Foxp3+T cells. (B) The representative percentages of Ki-67+ cells in TNFR2hiTregs, TNFR2lowTregs, and TNFR2negTregs were determined using FACS. (B) Summary data of Ki-67+ cells frequency in TNFR2hiTregs, TNFR2lowTregs, and TNFR2negTregs (n=16). (D) Correlation between Ki-67 and TNFR2 expressed by Tregs in MPE (n=16). (E) The histogram showing the expression of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 on TNFR2+Tregs (red filled histogram) and TNFR2-Tregs (blue filled). The gray filled histogram depicts the isotype control. (F) The graph summarizes the frequency of CTLA-4+ cells and PD-L1+ cells within each cell type (n=11). (G) TNFR2 expression correlates with CTLA-4 and PD-L1 expression on Tregs in MPE (n=11). The percentages were determined by flow cytometry. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Flow analysis was gated on live cells. ***, P<0.001, ****, P<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA or Paired Student’s t-test. Correlations were determined by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. TNFR2, tumor necrosis factor receptor type II; MPE, malignant pleural effusion.