Table 1. Clinical trials with CDK4/6 or biological agents in combination with endocrine treatment in neoadjuvant setting.
Trial | Phase | Experimental arm | Control arm | Duration of the treatments | N of patients | Primary endpoint | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEOPAL (17) | II | L + P | FEC ×3 → D ×3 | 19 w | 106 | RCB0/I | 7.7% vs. 15% |
NeoPalAna (18) | II | ANA → ANA + P; ANA + P | – | 5 mo.; 6 mo. | 50 | CCCA after 15 d | 26% vs. 87% (P<0.001) |
PALLET (19) | II | L → P; P → L; P + L | L alone | 14 w | 307 | CRR; Ki-67 changes | 54.3% vs. 49.5%; 4.1 vs. 2.2 (P<0.001) |
MONALEESA-1 (20) | II | L + R (400 mg); L + R (600 mg) | L alone; L alone | N.A. | 14 | Ki-67 reduction rate | 96% vs. 69%; 92% vs. 69% |
NeoMONARCH (21) | II | ABE; ABE + ANA | ANA | 14 w | 223 | Ki-67 reduction rate | 92.6% vs. 63.2% |
N007 (22) | II | L + P | – | 16 w | 20 | CRR | CRR in 17/20 pts; CR in 8/20 pts |
LORELEI (23) | II | L + taselisib | L + pl | 16 w | 334 | CRR | Overall: 50% vs. 39%; PIK3CAm: 38% vs. 56%; overall: 2% vs. 1%; PIK3Cam: 1% vs. 0% |
CORALLEEN (13) | II | R + L | AC → Pac | 24 w | 106 | Low-ROR risk after surgery | 46.9% vs. 46.1% |
FELINE (24) | II | L + Ri; L + Rc | L | 24 w | 32; 28 | PEPI score 0 at surgery | 25.4% vs. 25.8% |
L, letrozole; P, palbociclib; FEC, 5-fluoro-uracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; D, docetaxel; Ri, ribociclib intermittent; Rc, ribociclib continuous; RCB, residual cancer burden; PEPI, Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index; ANA, anastrozole; CCCA, complete cell cycle arrest (Ki-67 <2.7%); CCR, clinical response rate (Ki-67 <2.7%); CR, complete response; pCR, pathological complete response; pl, placebo; Pac, paclitaxel; w, weeks; mo., months; N.A., not available.