Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 2;5(1):34–40. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12443

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of HBsAg reduction between the two subgroups according to the baseline factors in the ETV‐TAF and ETV groups. The median HBsAg changes in the subgroups with (a) HBsAg <3.00 log IU/mL: (Inline graphic), ETV‐TAF: HBsAg < 3.00 log IU/mL; (Inline graphic), ETV: HBsAg < 3.00 log IU/mL, (b) HBsAg ≥3.00 log IU/mL: (Inline graphic), ETV‐TAF: HBsAg ≥ 3.00 log IU/mL; (Inline graphic), ETV: HBsAg ≥ 3.00 log IU/mL, (c) positive HBeAg: (Inline graphic), ETV‐TAF: HBeAg positive; (Inline graphic), ETV: HBeAg positive, (d) negative HBeAg: (Inline graphic), ETV‐TAF: HBeAg negative; (Inline graphic), ETV: HBeAg negative, (e) HBV genotype B: (Inline graphic), ETV‐TAF: genotype B; (Inline graphic), ETV: genotype B, and (f) HBV genotype C: (Inline graphic), ETV‐TAF: genotype C; (Inline graphic), ETV: genotype C. ETV, entecavir; HBeAg, hepatitis B envelope antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.