Table 2.
Results of one-sample t-tests examining coherence increase in actual dyads compared to random pairs
| TD—complete | TD—matched | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (s.d.) | t statistic | M (s.d.) | t statistic | |
| CompP—HbO | ||||
| rDLPFC | 0.032 (0.055) | t(37) = 3.624, Padj = 0.005, d = 0.59 | ||
| lDLPFC | 0.025 (0.059) | t(39) = 2.729, Padj = 0.025, d = 0.43 | ||
| rFPC | 0.034 (0.051) | t(40) = 4.272, Padj = 0.001, d = 0.67 | 0.044 (0.062) | t(17) = 3.043, Padj = 0.044, d = 0.72 |
| lFPC | 0.015 (0.037) | t(40) = 2.561, Padj = 0.031, d = 0.40 | 0.031 (0.042) | t(17) = 3.121, Padj = 0.044, d = 0.74 |
| mFPC | 0.024 (0.037) | t(40) = 4.178, Padj = 0.001, d = 0.65 | ||
| CompP—HbR | ||||
| BA8 | 0.014 (0.028) | t(33) = 2.979, Padj = 0.018, d = 0.51 | ||
| rDLPFC | 0.014 (0.030) | t(37) = 2.841, Padj = 0.022, d = 0.46 | ||
| rFPC | 0.020 (0.037) | t(40) = 3.490, Padj = 0.006, d = 0.55 | 0.021 (0.026) | t(17) = 3.400, Padj = 0.041, d = 0.80 |
| lFPC | 0.017 (0.033) | t(40) = 3.232, Padj = 0.010, d = 0.50 | ||
| mFPC | 0.020 (0.029) | t(40) = 4.402, Padj = 0.001, d = 0.69 | 0.023 (0.028) | t(17) = 3.476, Padj = 0.041, d = 0.82 |
| CoopP—HbO | ||||
| rFPC | 0.017 (0.046) | t(40) = 2.355, Padj = 0.043, d = 0.37 | ||
| CoopP—HbR | ||||
| rFPC | 0.013 (0.032) | t(40) = 2.571, Padj = 0.031, d = 0.40 | ||
| lFPC | 0.011 (0.029) | t(40) = 2.465, Padj = 0.036, d = 0.38 | ||
Notes: One-sample t-tests were conducted (one-sided) for each region, examining whether the sample mean is greater than zero. Padj = P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons (48 tests) using FDR correction; CompP, parent–child competition; CoopP, parent–child cooperation