Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;11:58. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01164-y

Table 3.

Tocilizumab compared to control cohort based on propensity-weighteda models for quality of life patient-reported outcomes after adjusting for baseline values and aGVHD (grades II–IV).

Assessment Day 28 Day 100 Day 180
Estimate (95% CI) P value Estimate (95% CI) P value Estimate (95% CI) P value
Depression 4.73 (0.64, 8.81) 0.02 1.54 (−2.81, 5.88) 0.49 4.41 (−0.59, 9.40) 0.08
Anxiety 1.64 (−0.16, 3.44) 0.07 2.82 (0.86, 4.78) 0.005 1.76 (−0.48, 4.00) 0.12
Fatigue, intensity 0.36 (−0.41, 1.13) 0.36 0.18 (−0.66, 1.01) 0.68 0.89 (−0.05, 1.82) 0.06
Fatigue, duration 1.13 (−0.56, 2.83) 0.19 1.11 (−0.70, 2.93) 0.23 1.22 (−0.85, 3.30) 0.25
Fatigue, interference −0.31 (−1.16, 0.54) 0.47 −0.27 (−1.18, 0.64) 0.56 −0.37 (−1.41, 0.67) 0.48
Pain, intensity 1.22 (0.49, 1.96) 0.001 0.27 (−0.53, 1.07) 0.50 0.98 (0.07, 1.88) 0.04
Pain, interference 0.11 (−0.78, 0.99) 0.81 −0.15 (−1.13, 0.82) 0.75 0.08 (−1.02, 1.19) 0.88
Sleep 1.32 (−0.30, 2.94) 0.11 1.47 (−0.23, 3.17) 0.09 2.46 (0.54, 4.38) 0.01

aPropensity scores were obtained using a logistic regression model with age, sex, BMI, CMV status, conditioning regimen, and donor type as predictors of study group.