Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):e041379. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041379

Table 6.

Number and average quality of included articles disaggregated by type of migrant and Bay Area Regional Health Inequities Initiative (BARHII) dimensions

Category Number of studies per study design with level of evidence* Total # studies Mean quality References
CR-4 AC-4 QL-3 CS-3 PR-3 CC-3 QL-2 PR-2 RC-2
Type of migrant
 Asylum seekers and refugees 1 1 1 3 2 1 10† 58.4% 8 29 30 32 35 36 88–91
 Foreign workers 4 7 4 10 1 1 12 1 41‡ 45.7% 27 31 33 34 37 46–81
 Unclassified migrants 1 6 2 2 5 16 52.7% 28 38–45 82–87 92
Dimension of BARHII framework
 Institutional inequities 1‡ 27
 Living conditions 2 1 1 4 2 1† 59.7% 8 28–37
 Risk behaviour 1 3 1 1 4 10 48.7% 38–47
 Disease and injury 4 6 7 11 2 14 2 46 46.3% 34 37 48–91
 Mortality and morbidity 1 1 2 47.9% 28 92
Subdimensions of institutional inequities
 Laws and regulations 1‡ 27
Subdimensions of living conditions
 Social environment 1 1 50.0% 36
 Economic and work environment 1 1 44.4% 37
 Service environment 2 1 4 1 9‡ 62.8% 8 28–35
Subdimensions of risk behaviour
 Poor nutrition 1 1 2 50.0% 39 44
 Violence and abuse 2 2 70.0% 38 43
 Alcohol and other drugs 1 1 22.2% 40
 Sexual behaviour 1 2 3 50.9% 41 42 45
 Hygiene and sanitation 1 1 22.2% 47
 Hazard and safety awareness 1 1 50.0% 46
Subdimensions of disease and injury
 Communicable disease 3 2 6 4 2 10 27 44.2% 48 50 51 53–58 61 64 65 68 69 71 72 74 82 83 85–87 89
 Non-communicable disease 1 1 1 3 50.8% 75 77 78 81
 Injury 2 1 3 2 1 9 47.4% 59 67 88
 Mental health 1 1 2 1 5 56.1% 37 60 62 63 66 70 76 79 80
 Various diseases 2 2 38.9% 49 73 84 90 91
34 52
Subdimensions of mortality and morbidity
 Mortality rates 1 1 33.3% 28
 Morbidity rates 1 1 62.5% 92
Total 4 9 1 10 13 3 4 19 2 67†, ‡ 49.2% 8 27–92

*Level of evidence ranks from 1 to 4, where 1 is the highest level of evidence and 4 is the lowest level.

†Includes a mixed-method design, which was not appraised for level of evidence nor quality of the study.

‡Includes a scoping review design, which was not appraised for level of evidence nor quality of the study.

AC-4, analytical cross-sectional study; CC-3, case control; CR-4, case report; CS-3, case series; PR-2, prevalence study with analytical component; PR-3, prevalence study without analytical component; QL-2, qualitative study with more rigour; QL-3, qualitative study with less rigour; RC-2, randomised controlled trial.