Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;27(4):532–537. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.01.013

Table 3.

Summary of RCT results of prophylactic candidates against COVID-19 and/or SARS-CoV-2

Study P(r)EP type Intervention Control Target population Intention to treat Sample size Study conclusions
Abella [27] PrEP HCQ (600 mg daily, 8 weeks) Placebo HCW HCQ 4/64, 6.3% vs control 4/61, 6.6% (p >0.99) Total: 132
HCQ: 66
Control: 66
No observed effect
Barnabas [28] PEP HCQ (400 mg daily; 3 days and 200 mg daily; 11 days) Ascorbic acid (500 mg daily; 250 mg daily) Contacts HR = 1.1 (95% CI 0.73–1.66, p > 0.20) Total: 671
HCQ: 337
Control: 334
No observed effect
Boulware [29] PEP HCQ (800 mg once; 600 mg in 6-8 hours, 600 mg for 4 days) Placebo Household contacts; HCW HCQ 49/414, 11.8% vs control 58/407, 14.3% (p 0.35) Total: 821
HCQ: 414;
Control: 407
No observed effect
Mitja [32]a PEP HCQ (800 mg once; 400 mg daily for 6 days) No intervention Contacts Risk ratio = 0.89 (95% CI 0.54–1.46) Total; 2314
HCQ: 1116
Control: 1198
No observed effect
Rajasingham [30] PrEP HCQ (400 mg twice in 6-8 hours; 400 mg once weekly for 12 weeks or 400 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks) Placebo HCW Once weekly: HR = 0.72 (95% CI 0.44–1.16; p 0.18)
Twice weekly: HR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.46–1.19; p 0.22)
Total: 1483
HCQ once weekly: 494
HCQ twice weekly: 495
Control: 494
No observed effect

Abbreviation: CI, confidence intervals; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 19; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; HCW, healthcare workers; PEP, postexposure prophylaxis; PrEP, preexposure prophylaxis; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; VH-Fc, heavy variable domain fragment crystallization region.

∗∗ Studies identified post database search.

a

Studies identified through medRxiv.