Table 3.
Conventional methods | Microfluidics methods | |
---|---|---|
Advantages | Capable in scaling up a single experiment Well-established protocols Available assays and standardization |
Small device footprint Low contamination risk Low sample consumption Easy in integration of multi-step protocols Easily disposable Rapid and easy fluid manipulation Real time process monitoring Flexible in changing the protocols or experimental setup Low shear force on biological samples |
Challenges | Low recovery rate Fixed device design and architecture High volume consumption Limited to end-point analysis Labor intensive and trained technicians for running experimental tests Less control over the process High maintenance cost |
Complex operational control and manufacturing Requires multiple components such as pump, valve, tubing, and connectors for operation Standardization and industrialization Sensitive to operational conditions Difficult for mass production |