Table 3.
Area wise comparison.
| Factor | Residence | Mean | Std. Deviation | T-value | Sig. (2 tailed) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity at student residence∗ | City Village |
.99 .95 |
.094 .219 |
2.462 | .014 |
| Having an internet connection∗ | City Village |
.87 .63 |
.342 .485 |
5.749 | .000 |
| Having a separate reading room∗ | City Village |
.54 .38 |
.500 .487 |
3.249 | .001 |
| Having a computer∗ | City Village |
.63 .35 |
.484 .477 |
5.997 | .000 |
| Having an android phone | City Village |
.94 .91 |
.235 .288 |
1.249 | .212 |
| Electricity during online class time∗ | City Village |
.58 .44 |
.495 .498 |
2.507 | .013 |
| Unstable internet connection during class time∗ | City Village |
.62 .88 |
.486 .329 |
5.279 | .000 |
| Paying proper attention during online class∗ | City Village |
.42 .24 |
.496 .428 |
3.474 | .001 |
| The regularity of online class∗ | City Village |
.61 .48 |
.489 .501 |
2.578 | .010 |
| Understanding lesson through online | City Village |
.24 .22 |
.425 .418 |
.257 | .798 |
| Scope of questioning & Answering through online | City Village |
.83 .80 |
.373 .398 |
.742 | .459 |
| Possibility of assessment through the distance learning process | City Village |
.22 .22 |
.415 .417 |
-.078 | .938 |
| Submitting assignment through current distance learning | City Village |
.39 .38 |
.489 .487 |
.157 | .876 |
| Effectiveness of online class for the teaching-learning process | City Village |
.52 .50 |
.501 .501 |
.362 | .718 |
Source: survey data, 2020
N.B.: 5% level of significance and two-tailed test.
∗
Marked factors have a statistically significant difference for the students of the city and village.