Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 24;42(3):753–765. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25260

TABLE 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the tinnitus patients and healthy volunteers

Demographic Tinnitus‐EG (baseline, n = 29) Tinnitus‐EG (treated, n = 29) Tinnitus‐IG (baseline, n = 35) Tinnitus‐IG (treated, n = 35) Controls (n = 63) p‐Value
Age, years 48.83 (±12.64) 47.46 (±12.33) 47.05 (±12.19) .812 a
Gender 12 males, 17 females 20 males, 15 females 33 males, 30 females .438 b
Handedness 29 right‐handed 35 right‐handed 63 right‐handed >0.99 a
THI score 69.24 (±21.44) 33.03 (±20.00) 42.74 (±18.71) 47.74 (±19.43) NA <.001 c
ΔTHI score 36.21 (±18.57) −4.80 (±10.85) NA NA
% Improvement of THI score 53.17% (±19.56%) −15.81% (±41.09%) NA
Duration, months ≥6 and ≤48 ≥6 and ≤48 NA NA
Type d 16:2:1:1:6:3 21:6:4:1:2:1 NA .804 a
Tinnitus pitch 250–8,000 Hz 250–8,000 Hz NA NA
Laterality 4 right, 11 left, 13 bilateral 6 right, 9 left, 20 bilateral NA .322 e

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; EG, effective group; IG, ineffective group; NA, not applicable; THI, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, THI score, THIbaseline − THItreated.

a

One‐way ANOVA.

b

Chi‐square test.

c

Two‐way ANOVA.

d

One single high‐pitched sound versus one single low‐pitched sound versus two or more high pitched sounds versus two low pitched sounds versus two or more irregular sounds versus indistinguishable.

e

Mann–Whitney U test.