Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec;9(6):2535–2544. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-434

Table 2. TRK inhibitors in selected clinical studies.

Study/author Treatment Design No. of pts. ORR (%) PFS (months) OS (months) trAEs (% gr.3–5)
Drilon et al. (28) Larotrectinib Phase 1/2 55 75 NA NA gr.3: 13%, gr.4–5: 0%
Lassen et al. (31) Larotrectinib Phase 1/2 122 81 NA NA gr.3: 6%+ <1% for fatigue, dizziness, myalgia, gr.4:<1% ALT increase, gr.5: 0%
Hong et al. (32) Larotrectinib Phase 1/2 159 79 28.3 (22.1–NE) 44.4 (36.5–NE) gr.3: 39%, gr.4: 7%, gr.5: 0%
Demetri et al. (33) Entrectinib Phase 1/2 54 57.4 11.2 (8.0–14.9) 20.9 (14.9–NE) gr.3: 37%, gr.4: 1.5%, gr.5: 0%
Doebele et al. (34) Entrectinib Phase 1/2 54 57 11.2 (8.0–14.9) Estimated 21 (14.9–NE) gr.3: 61%, gr.4: 9%, gr.5: 0%
Hyman et al. (35) Selitrectinib Phase I + EAP 29 34 NA NA

In brackets for PFS and OS, 95% CI. TRK, tropomyosin receptor kinase; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; NA, not available; EAP, Early Access Program; trAEs, treatment-related adverse events; gr., grade; CI, confidence interval; NE, not estimable.