Table 5.
Measures | HC vs all patients AUC |
HC vs tAD AUC |
HC vs PCA AUC |
tAD vs PCA AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.629 | 0.625 | 0.635 | 0.528 |
MD | 0.830 | 0.812 | 0.858 | 0.646 |
AngleR | 0.902 | 0.922 | 0.873 | 0.559 |
PerpPD | 0.889 | 0.862 | 0.961 | 0.731 |
ParlPD | 0.836 | 0.777 | 0.927 | 0.771 |
Cortical GM_fr | 0.874 | 0.861 | 0.911 | 0.645 |
Cortical Thickness | 0.811 | 0.781 | 0.870 | 0.658 |
Hipp_fr | 0.838 | 0.856 | 0.798 | 0.688 |
This table resumed the AUC for each measure comparing the groups with each other
AUC area under the curve, HC healthy controls, tAD typical Alzheimer’s disease, PCA posterior cortical atrophy, FA fractional anisotropy, MD mean diffusivity, AngleR angle between the radial minicolumnar direction and the principal diffusion direction, PerpPD the principal diffusion component perpendicular to the radial minicolumnar direction, ParlPD the principal diffusion component parallel with the radial minicolumnar direction, Hipp_fr hippocampal fraction. In bold the highest AUC for each comparison