Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;159:105047. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105047

Table 4.

Summary of participants consistently classified as positive, non and negative responders to portion size reductions across all portion size contrasts.

Consistently classed as + ve responder Consistently classed as non-responder Consistently classed as –ve responder Inconsistent responder classification
Study 1 (n = 45) 13 (29%) 3 (7%) 1 (2%) 28 (62%)
Study 2 (n = 36) 7 (19%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 29 (81%)
Study 3 (n = 30) 6 (20%) 4 (13%) 0 (0%) 20 (67%)
Across studies (n = 111) 26 (23%) 7 (6%) 1 (1%) 77 (69%)

‘Consistently classed’ indicates participant was a +ve, non or –ve responder across all 3 portion size reduction contrasts (i.e. large-normal vs. smaller than normal, large-normal vs. small-normal, small-normal vs. smaller than normal). Inconsistent classification indicates number of participants whose responder classification was not the same across all 3 portion size reduction contrasts.