Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 3;31(1):e02224. doi: 10.1002/eap.2224

Table 3.

Trophic groups whose biomass was affected significantly by No‐Take Marine Reserve (NTMR) protection and/or cover of live hard coral (HC).

Trophic group

Direct positive NTMR effect (no. islands with : without NTMR effect)

Live HC effect (no. sites with + : − : neutral HC effect)
Generalist large predators 2:0 4:0:0
Large planktivores 2:0 3:0:1
Piscivores 0:2 4:0:0
Obligate corallivores 0:2 4:0:0
Small planktivores 0:2 4:0:0
Omnivorous pomacentrids 0:2 3:0:1
Small benthic foragers 0:2 2:2:0
Croppers 0:2 1:1:2
Detritivores 0:2 0:4:0
Sand feeders 0:2 0:4:0
Large benthic foragers 0:2 0:4:0
Excavators 0:2 0:3:1
Scrapers 0:2 0:3:1
Total biomass 2:0 3:0:1
Proportion of clear effects 2 of 13 trophic groups 11 of 13 trophic groups

Ratios in column two show the number of islands (Sumilon, Apo) with : without a significant, direct NTMR effect on biomass of the trophic group. Ratios in column three show the number of sites (Sumilon NTMR, Sumilon Fished, Apo NTMR, Apo Fished) with a positive : negative : neutral effect of live hard coral cover on the biomass of the trophic group.

An effect that was statistically not significant but was visually clear.