Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2019 Mar 28;90(3):708–718. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13235

Table 2.

Regression Models for English CELF-4 Indices, B(SE)

Dependent variables
Core Language Receptive Language Expressive Language
Intercept 66.37*** (4.88) 87.15*** (3.99) 63.35*** (4.91)
SESa 1.20*** (0.29) 0.99*** (0.24) 1.28*** (0.29)
Current Exposure to Englishb 26.47*** (6.33) 6.95 (5.23) 28.09*** (6.37)
AoA Englishc −0.16** (0.06) −0.16** (0.05) −0.16** (0.06)
Working Memoryd 6.54*** (1.14) 4.77*** (0.95) 6.19*** (1.15)
Exposure to CSe 2.10 (1.15) 1.08 (0.94) 2.63* (1.16)
WM:CSf 2.54* (1.04) 2.79** (0.86) 2.58* (1.05)
ηp² WM:CSg 0.035 0.059 0.036
Observations 169 173 169
R2 0.52 0.44 0.52
Adjusted R2 0.50 0.42 0.50
F Statistic 28.87*** 21.73*** 29.20***
(df = 6; 162) (df = 6; 166) (df = 6; 162)

Note:

p < 0.10,

*

p <0.05;

**

p <0.01;

***

p <0.001

a

Socio Economic Status measured by maternal years of education

b

Parental report of percent exposure to English during waking hours in a typical week

c

Parental report of first exposure to English

d

Woodcock-Johnson III Number Reversed scores

e

Amount of code-switching heard on a 0–10 scale, averaged across family and school persons

f

Interaction between working memory and exposure to code-switching

g

Effect size of interaction; partial eta squared