Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;8:100326. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100326

Table 3.

Association between presence of intestinal finding on computed tomography and patients’ outcome.

No intestinal imaging findings (N%) Intestinal imaging findings (N%) Crude
Rate Ratio
(95% CI)
Minimally adjusted*
Rate Ratio
(95% CI)
Fully ajusted Rate Ratio*
(95% CI)
Worse clinical outcome 17 (27%) 11 (55%) RR = 2.7(1.3–5.9)
P = 0.008
RR = 3.0
(1.2–7.2)
P = 0.01
RR = 2.6
(1.1–6.7)
P = 0.04
Death 14 (22%) 9 (45%) RR = 1.4(0.63–3.4)
P = 0.3
RR = 1.4
(0.6–3.3)
P = 0.02
RR = 1.4
(0.5–3.5)
P = 0.6
Invasive mechanical ventilation 7 (11%) 7 (35%) RR = 4.3(1.5–12.2)
P = 0.006
RR = 6.6
(1.9–23.4)
P = 0.003
RR = 6.2
(1.7–22.6)
P = 0.005
ICU admission 21 (34%) 10 (50%) RR = 1.1(0.5–2.4)
P = 0.7
RR = 1.1
(0.5–2.3)
P = 0.7
RR = 1.1
(0.5–2.5)
P = 0.7
No intestinal imaging findings (N%) Intestinal imaging findings (N%) Crude Difference Minimally adjusted difference Fully adjusted difference
Hospital lenght (days) 15.2 20.1 +4.9 (-2.5; + 12.4)
P = 0.2
+5.5 (-2.1; +13.2)
P = 0.2
+ 6.2
(-1.7; +14.4)
P = 0.1
ICU lenght (days) 7.6 13.7 +6.6
(-12.8; +0.5)
P = 0.06
+7.3
(-0.2; + 14.9)
P = 0.05
+7.1
(-0.9; + 15.2)
P = 0.07

*Minimally adjusted: age and gender **Fully adjusted: age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer.