Table 1.
n | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | p value | HR | 95% CI | p value | ||
Gender | |||||||
Male | 88 | 1 | |||||
Female | 49 | 0.884 | 0.585–1.336 | 0.558 | |||
Age (years) | |||||||
≥ 65 | 57 | 1 | |||||
< 65 | 80 | 0.855 | 0.573–1.276 | 0.444 | |||
Location | |||||||
Head | 88 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Other | 49 | 0.599 | 0.394-0.911 | 0.016 | 0.507 | 0.327–.786 | 0.002 |
Grading | |||||||
G1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | ||||
G2 | 102 | 1.728 | 0.628–4.755 | 0.29 | 2.661 | 0.887–7.981 | 0.081 |
G3 | 28 | 3.911 | 1.352–11.311 | 0.012 | 6.182 | 1.998–19.128 | 0.002 |
G4a | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
pStage | |||||||
I | 21 | 1 | 1 | ||||
II | 63 | 2.885 | 1.354–6.144 | 0.006 | 2.858 | 1.331–6.137 | 0.007 |
III | 45 | 4.221 | 1.977–9.014 | < 0.001 | 4.062 | 1.881–8.771 | < 0.001 |
IV | 8 | 5.57 | 2.075–14.95 | 0.001 | 6.93 | 2.357–20.38 | < 0.001 |
Vascular invasion | |||||||
Yes | 37 | 1 | |||||
No | 100 | 1.027 | 0.66–1.596 | 0.907 | |||
CA199 (U/ml) | |||||||
< 37 | 33 | 1 | |||||
≥ 37 | 104 | 1.486 | 0.928–2.378 | 0.099 | |||
Diameter (cm) | |||||||
≥ 4 | 69 | 1 | |||||
< 4 | 68 | 1.477 | 1–0.182 | 0.0503 | |||
Procedure | |||||||
PD | 85 | 1 | |||||
DP | 43 | 0.688 | 0.446–1.061 | 0.09 | |||
TP | 9 | 0.747 | 0.323–1.728 | 0.495 | |||
Postoperative chemotherapy | |||||||
No | 57 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Yes | 80 | 0.488 | 0.324–0.734 | 0.001 | 0.474 | 0.312–0.722 | 0.001 |
VISTA in TCs | |||||||
Low | 101 | 1 | 1 | ||||
High | 36 | 0.588 | 0.365–0.946 | 0.029 | 0.452 | 0.269–0.757 | 0.003 |
VISTA in ICs | |||||||
Low | 82 | 1 | |||||
High | 55 | 1.116 | 0.745–1.671 | 0.595 | |||
VISTA in ECs | |||||||
Low | 105 | 1 | |||||
High | 32 | 0.97 | 0.603–1.561 | 0.902 | |||
PD-L1 | |||||||
Low | 107 | 1 | 1 | ||||
High | 30 | 1.759 | 1.085–2.853 | 0.022 | 2.242 | 1.344–3.738 | 0.002 |
HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, TC tumor cells, IC immune cells, ECs endothelial cells, PD pancreaticoduodenectomy, DP distal pancreatectomy, TP total pancreatectomy
aBecause small number of cases in these groups, the survival analysis was meaningless