Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 7;14:613531. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.613531

TABLE 3.

Results of 2-way ANOVA analyses.

CTRL vs delay
LL-ad lib vs LL-RF
Gene Two-way ANOVA P value P value summary P value P value summary
c-fos Interaction <0.0001 **** 0.0022 **
Time <0.0001 **** 0.0012 **
Group <0.0001 **** <0.0001 ****
Per1 Interaction 0.0692 ns 0.0572 ns
Time 0.4003 ns 0.1254 ns
Group <0.0001 **** <0.0001 ****
Per2 Interaction 0.3168 ns <0.0001 ****
Time 0.0205 * <0.0001 ****
Group <0.0001 **** 0.0609 ns
Nr1d1 Interaction 0.1673 ns <0.0001 ****
Time 0.8828 ns 0.0008 ***
Group <0.0001 **** 0.7785 ns
Rorα Interaction 0.8877 ns <0.0001 ****
Time 0.0072 ** 0.0003 ***
Group 0.0226 * 0.4578 ns
Dbp Interaction 0.4036 ns 0.0004 ***
Time 0.0666 ns 0.0002 ***
Group <0.0001 **** 0.0205 *
VIP Interaction 0.0024 ** 0.1359 ns
Time 0.0006 *** <0.0001 ****
Group 0.0489 * <0.0001 ****
AVP Interaction 0.0509 ns 0.0043 **
Time <0.0001 **** <0.0001 ****
Group 0.5173 ns 0.3543 ns
Nr3c1 Interaction 0.0488 * 0.6803 ns
Time 0.2163 ns 0.0104 *
Group <0.0001 **** 0.3721 ns

Comparison between the gene expression profiles in the fetal SCN of the control group (CTRL) and the group exposed to 6-h phase delay in LD12:12 (Delay), and between the group exposed to constant light with ad libitum feeding (LL-ad lib) and constant light with restricted feeding regime (LL-RF). The gene expression profiles are shown in Figures 2, 5. The results of significance levels (P) for the interaction between groups, the effect of time and the effect of group (gray) are shown.