TABLE 2.

Papers which met the inclusion criteria in the school setting analyzed according to Bjekic et al. (2014).

School	E-learning (N Studies)		Limitations	Strenghts
	ICT	E-platforms
Primary/Secondary School	4(3*)	8**(6*)	− Lack of interest:	− Promotion of:
			• technology in the development of	• skills and academic knowledge
			student curriculum	educational outcome
			design framework for digital materials	students’independence and self-regulation
			personalized paths parent’s training in supporting children’s e-learning experience	pathway for the transition from school to further study learning styles
				communication among children, teachers and parents
				metacognitive experience
				emotional well-being
				tutor/teacher scaffolding
				parents support
High school	1*	1*	− Lack of:	− Promotion of:
			• design interface	• tutor/teacher scaffolding
			appropriate online instruction strategies	social support
				stress and anxiety reduction
University		12 (3*)	− Lack of:	− Promotion of:
			• longitudinal studies	• scaffolding (instructor-learner interaction)
			self-regulation and emotional well-being	social support
				metacognitive interventions
				academic retention

^∗Presence of Assistive Technology. ^∗∗Three studies with E-platforms and ICT.