TABLE 2.
Summary of 3 three-level multilevel analyses: snacking regressed on internal and external cues using average negative affect (NA) per day as a moderator.
|
Odds Ratios (95% CIs) of External and Internal Cues |
|||
| (a) Availability of Food | (b) Others Eating | (c) Negative Affect | |
| Fixed Effects (Occasion level) | |||
| Intercept | 0.23 (0.17, 0.30)*** | 0.25 (0.13, 0.32)*** | 0.24 (0.20, 0.30)*** |
| Cue (main effect) | 5.38 (3.44, 8.41)*** | 4.96 (3.49, 7.06)*** | 1.02 (1.01, 1.04)*** |
| Fixed Effects (Day Level) | |||
| Day in study | 0.97 (0.94,0.99)* | 0.97 (0.94,0.99)* | 0.98 (0.95,1.00) |
| NA Level * Intercept | 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) |
| NA Level * Slope Cue | 0.97 (0.93, 1.02) | 0.97 (0.93, 1.01) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) |
| Random Effects | Variance Component (SD) | Variance Component (SD) | Variance Component (SD) |
| σ2 ntercept Level-1 | 0.29 (0.54) | 0.35 (0.58) | 0.00 (0.00) |
| σ2 Intercept Level-1/2 | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) |
*p < 0.05, ***p = 0.001. NA, Negative Affect; SD, Standard Deviation.