Table 2.

Multivariate Regression Analysis of the Disc Fovea Angle to Multiple Parameters

	P	Standardized Correlation Coefficient (β)	Standardized Correlation Coefficient Squared (β2)	Non-Standardized Correlation Coefficient (B)	95% CI
Disc–fovea-angle associated with (P = 0.002 for the whole model)
Inferior gamma zone location	0.001	0.22	0.05	1.80	0.72, 2.88
Age (y)	0.008	0.18	0.03	0.09	0.02, 0.16
When added separately to the model
Gender (male/female)	0.37	0.06	0.004	0.50	–0.60, 1.60
Region of habitation (rural/urban)	0.07	–0.13	0.02	–1.06	–2.19, 0.08
Level of education (1–5)	0.25	–0.08	0.006	–0.33	–0.89, 0.23
Axial length (mm)	0.66	0.03	0.0009	0.09	–0.30, 0.48
Bruch's membrane opening diameter (µm)	0.24	0.08	0.006	0.001	–0.001, 0.004
Disc–fovea distance (mm)	0.11	–0.11	0.01	–1.28	−2.83, 0.28
Fundus tessellation degree (0–3)	0.46	0.06	0.004	0.30	–0.50, 1.11
Subfoveal choroidal thickness (µm)	0.25	–0.09	0.008	–0.004	–0.009, 0.002
Vertical fovea distance from the optic disc horizontal associated with (P < 0.001 for the whole model)
Inferior gamma zone location	0.001	0.25	0.06	0.17	0,07, 0.26
Gamma zone width (µm)	0.01	0.19	0.04	0.000	0,00, 0.00
When added separately to the model
Age (y)	0.12	0.11	0.01	0.005	–0.001, 0.011
Gender (male/female)	0.75	0.02	0.0004	0.015	–0.079, 0.109
Region of habitation (rural/urban)	0.29	–0.08	0.006	–0.05	–0.15, 0.05
Level of education (1–5)	0.72	–0.03	0.0009	–0.01	–0.07, 0.05
Axial length (mm)	0.96	0.005	0.00003	0.001	–0.04, 0.05
Bruch's membrane opening diameter (µm)	0.51	0.05	0.003	0.00007	0.000, 0.000
Disc–fovea distance (mm)	0.62	–0.04	0.002	−0.04	–0.18, 0.11
Fundus tessellation degree (0–3)	0.32	0.08	0.006	0.04	–0.04, 0.11
Subfoveal choroidal thickness (µm)	0.33	–0.08	0.006	0.000	–0.001, 0.000