Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;128(3):573–582. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16400

Table 1.

Modelled screening behaviour by type of screening programme: base‐case assumptions

Screening behaviour Cytology‐based screening programme hrHPV‐based screening programme
GP test participation by age in all women of the population *
30 years 52.3% 43.4%
35 years 57.9% 49.3%
40 years 64.3% 56.4%
45 years 67.6% 15.6%**
50 years 70.4% 61.5%
55 years 69.6% 12.7%**
60 years 66.8% 60.3%
65 years NA 3.1%***
Self‐sampling participation by age *
30 years NA 5.5%
35 years NA 4.8%
40 years NA 4.5%
45 years NA 0.9%**
50 years NA 4.6%
55 years NA 1.0%**
60 years NA 5.7%
65 years NA 0.2%***
Adherence to cytology after a positive self‐sample NA 90.1%
Adherence to triage testing
6 months after primary test 92.2% 77.1%
6 months after primary self‐sample NA 41.6%
18 months after primary test 67.3% NA
Adherence to a referral for colposcopy after a
Direct referral (ASC‐US/LSIL) NA 88.4%
Direct referral (HSIL) 97.0% 96.9%
Referral at 6 months after primary test (ASCUS/LSIL) 97.5% 88.4%
Referral at 6 months after primary test (HSIL) 97.5% 96.9%
Referral at 18 months after primary test 52.4% NA

ASC‐US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; hrHPV, high‐risk human papillomavirus; HSIL, high‐grade squamous intra‐epithelial lesion; LSIL, low‐grade squamous intra‐epithelial lesion; NA, not applicable.

*

Simulated participation rate in all women excluding those who have had a hysterectomy and those with a prevalent diagnosed cancer.

**

Participation in the general population is much lower at ages 45 and 55 because significantly fewer women are invited for screening at these ages (i.e. only those who do not participate or test hrHPV‐positive in the preceding screening round).

***

Participation in the general population is much lower at age 65 because significantly fewer women are invited for screening at this age (i.e. only those who test hrHPV‐positive at age 65).