Abstract
Nonsurgical bleeding is the most frequent complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Supraphysiologic shear rates generated in LVAD causes impaired platelet aggregation, which increases the risk of bleeding. The effect of shear rate on the formation size of platelet aggregates has never been reported experimentally, although platelet aggregation size can be considered to be directly relevant to bleeding complications. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of shear rate and exposure time on the formation size of platelet aggregates, which is vital in predicting bleeding in patients with an LVAD. Human platelet‐poor plasma (containing von Willebrand factor, vWF) and fluorochrome‐labeled platelets were subjected to a range of shear rates (0‐10 000 s−1) for 0, 5, 10, and 15 minutes using a custom‐built blood‐shearing device. Formed sizes of platelet aggregates under a range of shear‐controlled environment were visualized and measured using microscopy. The loss of high molecular weight (HMW) vWF multimers was quantified using gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. An inhibition study was also performed to investigate the reduction in platelet aggregation size and HMW vWF multimers caused by either mechanical shear or enzymatic (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13—ADAMTS13, the von Willebrand factor protease) mechanism under low and high shear conditions (360 and 10 000 s−1). We found that the average size of platelet aggregates formed under physiological shear rates of 360‐3000 s−1 (200‐300 μm2) was significantly larger compared to those sheared at >6000 s−1 (50‐100 μm2). Furthermore, HMW vWF multimers were reduced with increased shear rates. The inhibition study revealed that the reduction in platelet aggregation size and HWM vWF multimers were mainly associated with ADAMTS13. In conclusion, the threshold of shear rate must not exceed >6000 s−1 in order to maintain the optimal size of platelet aggregates to “plug off” the injury site and stop bleeding.
Keywords: ADAMTS13, exposure time, platelet aggregate, shear rate, von Willebrand factor
1. INTRODUCTION
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a life‐saving tool for providing hemodynamic support in patients with advanced, refractory left ventricular heart failure, either for temporary support (eg, bridge to cardiac transplantation), or as permanent destination therapy. 1 , 2 Despite the enormous benefits of LVAD, bleeding remains the major cause of morbidity, mortality, and cost during LVAD support, 3 , 4 which cannot be attributed to anticoagulation alone. 5 , 6 The pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for the bleeding diathesis in these patients have shown to be complex and poorly understood.
von Willebrand factor (vWF) acts as a bridging molecule at sites of vascular injury for normal platelet adhesion, as well as promoting platelet aggregation under a certain threshold of hydrodynamic forces, 7 and is thus critical to hemostasis. However, supraphysiologic shear stress can cause pathologic vWF degradation during LVAD support. 8 , 9 High molecular weight (HMW) vWF multimers are the most hemostatically competent, 10 and reduction in the HMW vWF multimers lead to impairment of vWF functional activity and platelet aggregation, which is associated with acquired von Willebrand Syndrome (aVWS). 11 , 12 During shear exposure, the unfolded vWF exposes its A2 domains, which are particularly sensitive to enzymatic cleavage by a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13). 9 , 13 , 14 Subsequently, this causes excessive degradation of HMW vWF multimers. Such loss of HMW vWF caused by enzymatic cleavage of ADAMTS13 has been reported in in vitro LVAD evaluations. 9 , 15
The trigger threshold of shear‐induced vWF unfolding has been reported between 5000 and 5522 s−1 (Table 1). 16 , 17 This is approximately two to three times greater than the reported normal physiologic intravascular shear rate (<2000 s−1), 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 but lower than those generated by LVAD (ranging from 1429 to 171 428 s−1). 8 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 While recent research established the relationship between shear rate and pathologic vWF degradation, precisely why bleeding complications only occur in some aVWS patients but not all remain unknown. An understanding of the formation size of platelet aggregates under different shear regimes might provide a new insight into how to solve this enigma.
TABLE 1.
Shear condition | Blood vessel or device condition | Shear rate (s−1) | Shear stress* (Pa) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Normal physiological condition | In veins | 15‐200 | 0.05‐0.7 | 18, 19, 20, 21 |
Large arteries | 286‐1142 | 1‐4 | ||
Micro arterioles | 450‐2000 | 1.6‐7 | ||
Shear‐induced unfolding trigger of vWF | Vascular injury site | 5000‐5522 | 17.5‐19.3 | 16, 17 |
Supraphysiological condition | Axial‐flow LVAD | 2571‐171 428 | 9‐600 | 8, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 46, 47 |
Centrifugal‐flow LVAD | 1429‐65 714 | 5‐230 | ||
Toroidal‐flow LVAD | 2286‐2857 | 8‐10 |
Indeed, the study of shear stress and exposure time are frequently examined in LVAD, and the effects on the degradation of HMW vWF multimers are predominately reported. 9 , 28 , 29 , 30 However, no experimental investigation into the relationship between platelet aggregation size and shear rates has been reported. While our previous study observed smaller, more dispersed platelet aggregates at high shear rates as preliminary results, 31 neither shear threshold nor real‐time visual investigation was established due to the limitation of previous blood shearing device. Hence, this study aimed to better understand how different mechanical shear stress and exposure time can alter the formation size of platelet aggregates in real‐time, and how it is linked to HMW vWF multimer cleavage by ADAMTS13 using a purpose‐built blood shearing device, which was incorporated with an inverted microscope. We hypothesized that the size of platelet aggregates is determined, in part, by shear history; specifically, when blood is exposed to shear beyond a critical threshold, platelet aggregate size and HMW vWF multimer size would be negatively impacted. The evaluation of platelet aggregate size provides an opportunity for novel approaches in detecting and monitoring bleeding due to pathological shear forces, particularly in those receiving LVAD therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy, and patients with severe aortic stenosis. 32 , 33 , 34
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Blood collection
Fresh human whole blood (45 mL) from consenting healthy volunteers was collected (n = 5), and anticoagulated with citrate phosphate dextrose adenine (CPDA‐1) solution (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at a final concentration of 14% (v/v). Prior to blood collection, all volunteers were informed about the aims of the study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Protocol number 2018/730).
2.2. Preparation of fluorochrome‐labeled platelets and platelet‐poor plasma
Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) was prepared by centrifuging whole blood for 10 minutes at 150 × g at room temperature. Ten milliters of PRP (500 000 platelets per μL) were stained with 50 μg of MitoTracker Red FM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) fluorochrome at 37°C for 2 hours. Platelet‐specific staining protocols were previously described. 35 After staining, fluorochrome‐labeled platelets were fixed with 1.37% formalin to maintain their membrane glycoprotein Ibα (GP Ibα) receptor function, which binds with vWF A1 domains during shear and form platelet aggregation. The remaining unstained PRP was further centrifuged for 5 minutes at 15 000 × g at room temperature to obtain platelet‐poor plasma (PPP) containing vWF.
2.3. Blood‐shearing device
Fluorochrome‐labeled platelets and PPP containing vWF with ristocetin were subjected to a wide range of shear‐controlled doses. Shear rates were generated at 0, 360, 1000, 3000, 6000, and 10 000 s−1 for 0, 5, 10, and 15 minutes using a custom‐built blood‐shearing device incorporated into an inverted fluorescence microscope (IX73, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) for real‐time visualization of platelet‐vWF interactions shown in Figure 1A. The chosen shear rates in this study corresponded to shear stresses of 0, 0.5, 1.3, 3.8, 7.5, 12.5 Pa calculated from a viscosity of 1.25 mPa·s of PPP measured by a viscometer (DV2T, AMETEC Brookfield, Middleborough, MA, USA). Briefly, the shear rates were generated by the rotational speed of the motor (0, 10, 28, 83, 167, and 278 RPM), which is transmitted from the motor to the sample chamber using pulley and transmission belts. The sample chamber consists of two parts: an acrylic bob and a glass plate that rotate in the opposite direction to generate shear Couette flow (Reynold number within the sample chamber <100 even at the highest shear rate of 10 000 s−1) 36 (Figure 1B). In the middle flow field at a radial distance of 3 mm from the axis is the observation target. The inner diameter of the acrylic bob is 19.79 mm and the gap size is 0.14 mm. The total loading sample volume is 200 μL. The rotating speed is adjustable from 10 to 278 RPM. This custom‐built blood‐shearing device was successfully used in previous studies. 37 , 38
2.4. Evaluation of platelet aggregation size using microscopy and image analysis
The platelets were diluted by imidazole buffered saline (IBS) and added into 200 μL of cell mixture (100 000 μL−1 of fluorochrome‐labeled platelets, 1 mg/dL of ristocetin, 10 μL of PPP, 130 μL of IBS). The formation of platelet aggregates under shear rates ranging from 360 to 10 000 s−1 was visualized in real‐time using a microscope with a ×40 magnification objective lens (LUCPLFLN 40X, Olympus Corporation) through acquired images of 162.5 nm/pixel resolution. MATLAB software (version R2018a, Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) was used to remove noise on images through binarization of image data and to transform the number of pixels of aggregation area to the actual size of platelet aggregates (μm2). The aggregate size is measured as a two‐dimensional area (surface area). In addition, the vWF function was assessed using the vWF ristocetin cofactor assay. 35
2.5. Gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting for high molecular weight vWF multimers
Electrophoresis was performed as previously described. 39 , 40 Briefly, PPP samples were run through a high gelling temperature SeaKem agarose gel (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) and transferred to an Immobilon‐P transfer membrane (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Membranes were blocked using 5% skim milk in Tris Buffered Saline with Tween (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and probed with horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated polyclonal rabbit anti‐human vWF (1:1000) (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). Membranes were washed and developed with enhanced chemiluminescence (Clarity ECL Western Blotting Substrate, Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Inc, Hercules, CA, USA), and vWF multimer band density visualized with an ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The densities of HMW vWF multimers were quantified using standard software (Image J, version 1.8.0_112, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The HMW vWF multimer density of each condition sample was normalized to the static (0 s−1) samples as a baseline and expressed as mean fold change ± standard deviation.
2.6. Investigation of the influence mechanism of platelet aggregation size and degradation of HMW vWF multimers
To investigate the influence of mechanical shear and enzymatic cleavage mechanism on platelet aggregation size, 10 mM of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used as an inhibitor for ADAMTS13 to prevent enzymatic cleavage of vWF. 29 The size of platelet aggregates was then obtained via microscopy and image analysis under a low and high shear rate of 360 and 10 000 s−1 for 15 minutes with or without the presence of EDTA using the same method mentioned above. Shear rates of 0 and 360 s−1 were used as negative and positive controls. In addition, we also use the vWF multimer analysis to double confirm this influence.
2.7. Statistical analysis
Equality of variances for two groups was assessed for each condition by F test. Additionally, if variances were considered as equal, one‐way ANOVA tests were used to analyze the mean difference between two groups of specific exposure time. All statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro (version 14 SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Data are described as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and P values <.05 are considered statistically significant.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Visual investigation of formation size of platelet aggregates measured by microscopy
Captured images of platelet aggregates at different shear rates (0‐10 000 s−1) and exposure time (0‐15 minutes) are provided in Table 2. Without shear, there was no formation of platelet aggregates (<50 µm2). Large platelet aggregates were formed (>200 µm2) from 360 to 3000 s−1 of shear rate between 5 and 15 minutes. The average formation size of platelet aggregates was significantly smaller (<100 µm2) when the shear rate was higher than 6000 s−1 compared to the results from 360 to 3000 s−1 (P < .05).
TABLE 2.
In the absence of shear rate, the platelet aggregation size was minute with an average size smaller than 50 µm2 (Figure 2A). While platelet aggregates larger than 200 µm2 were observed when sheared between 360 and 3000 s−1, the average aggregate size of platelets sheared at 6000 and 10 000 s−1 were significantly reduced (P < .05), respectively (Figure 2B‐D). When platelets were exposed to higher shear rates at 6000 and 10 000 s−1 for 15 minutes, the average platelet aggregate size decreased to 100.1 ± 8.2 and 65.7 ± 4.0 μm2, respectively. However, the results in Figure 3 show that the effect of exposure time has minimal influence on the aggregate size compared to the shear rate. In Figure S1, the result of flow cytometric investigation of the vWF function shows that there were no significant differences in normalized platelet aggregation between the different shear conditions.
3.2. Quantification of the loss of HMW vWF multimers using densitometry
vWF multimer analysis revealed that HMW vWF multimers (top dotted box) were cleaved into low‐molecular‐weight (LMW) vWF multimers (bottom dotted box) as the shear rate increased (Figure 4A). The result of densitometry showed that HMW vWF multimer degradation was evident when mechanical shear increased (Figure 4B). There was significant loss of HMW vWF under shear rates of 6000 and 10 000 s−1 for 15 minutes by 62% and 68%, respectively, compared to those without shear (0 s−1) (P < .05). Furthermore, at a maximum shear rate of 10 000 s−1, the density in HMW vWF shows it to be significantly lower than those sheared at 360 and 1000 s−1 (P < .05).
3.3. The effect of ADAMTS13 enzymatic cleavage on platelet aggregation size and degradation of HMW vWF multimers
In Figure 5A, the average platelet aggregation size was significantly lower in the absence of EDTA (64.9 μm2) compared to those with EDTA (176.3 μm2) following exposure to a high shear rate of 10 000 s−1 for 15 minutes (P < .05). Whereas, no significant difference was found in the average platelet aggregation size following exposure to a low shear rate of 360 s−1 for 15 minutes with (235 μm2) and without EDTA (229.7 μm2). In Figure 5B, the normalized HMW vWF fold change was significantly lower in the absence of EDTA (0.32) compared to those with EDTA (0.60) following exposure to a high shear of 10 000 and at 0 s−1 (P < .05). No significant differences were found in the normalized HMW vWF fold change following exposure to a low shear rate of 360 s−1 for 15 minutes with (0.68) and without EDTA (0.66).
4. DISCUSSION
During vascular injury, the shear‐induced unfolding of vWF has a central role in primary hemostasis where it mediates platelet adhesion to damaged vascular subendothelium and subsequently platelet aggregation. 7 This process has long been recognized as critical for hemostatic plug formation and to stop bleeding. 41 Although many studies reported the effect of shear rate and exposure time on the degradation of HMW vWF multimers, the effect of shear rate and exposure time on the formation size of platelet aggregates has never been reported experimentally. Our results demonstrate, for the first time that a critical shear threshold exists that determines platelet aggregate formation size, which extends prior knowledge on the effects of shear on HMW vWF degradation. This shear‐dependent platelet aggregation size could be one of the determinants that underpin bleeding events in LVAD patients.
Our result showed that above shear rate of 6000 s−1, the average size of observed platelet aggregates (<100 µm2) was significantly smaller than the platelet aggregates formed (>200 µm2) under shear rate of 3000 s−1. Smaller platelet aggregates were observed in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass. 42 When vWF is exposed to shear, the vWF uncoils and its string length can stretch either >200 µm (uncleaved ultra‐large vWF) or <100 µm (cleaved vWF fragments) which are consistent with our reported size of platelet aggregates. 43 With longer vWF string length stretches, as it exposes greater access to binding sites (GP Ibα), more platelets can adhere and hence larger platelet aggregates can form. Therefore, the formation of platelet aggregation size under different shear conditions could be an important parameter to predict and stop bleeding during vascular injury. 41 In addition, two studies reported similar thresholds of shear‐induced hydrodynamic activation of vWF. 16 , 17 Hence, we believe that the threshold of shear‐induced unfolding trigger of vWF and lead to reduction in the size of platelet aggregates is between 3000 and 6000 s−1.
It was previously demonstrated that the losses of HMW vWF under shear rates of 4000 and 8000 s−1 for 360 minutes were approximately 55% and 80%, respectively. 31 Our vWF multimer analysis result showed that the losses of HMW vWF under shear rates of 6000 and 10 000 s−1 for 15 minutes were 62% and 68%, respectively. These results indicate that the shear rate and exposure time are important contributors in the degradation of HMW vWF multimers. Moreover, while the multimers of HMW vWF monotonically deteriorated as shear rate increased, the aggregate size was clearly reduced when the shear rate was over 6000 s−1. These results infer that platelet‐vWF binding may be prevented in shears >3000 s−1, possibly due to strong hydrodynamic forces. 44 , 45 Furthermore, EDTA was used to inhibit ADAMTS13, which facilitated confirmation that decreased platelet aggregate size in higher shears was, indeed, associated with the degradation of HMW vWF multimers mediated by ADAMTS13 cleavage. 9
4.1. Limitations
Within this study, three limitations were identified. First, the current shear device is limited to generate a maximum shear rate of 10 000 s−1, where the entire range of shear rates (1429 to 171 428 s−1) reported in the current‐generation axial and centrifugal‐flow LVADs (Table 1) was unable to be assessed. However, shear rates investigated in this study represent more than 95% relative volume distribution of scalar shear rates ranging from 1429 to 14 286 s−1. 25 , 26 , 27 Of note, the new design of next‐generation LVADs such as toroidal‐flow LVAD has focused on providing full hemodynamic support with lower shear rate of approximately 2857 s−1 to reduce blood trauma. 46 , 47 Second, our current blood‐shearing experiments were performed at room temperature instead of body temperature (37°C) and aggregate size was assessed from two‐dimensional images rather than as three‐dimensional volumes. Third, the current work was focused on understanding the mechanobiology of vWF multimers interaction with platelets under shear and how that influences the formation sizes of platelet aggregates. However, platelet function was not assessed in this study which also contributes and influences the formation sizes of platelet aggregates. Therefore, the effect of shear rate and exposure time on the platelet function should be considered in future research. We will also investigate the effect of pulsatility on the formation size of platelet aggregates, platelet function, and vWF degradation because pulsatility plays an important role in the phasicity of intravascular shear stress and may have important relationships with vWF degradation and bleeding. 48 , 49
5. CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggested that the maximum threshold of shear rate was between 3000 and 6000 s−1 to maintain the normal size of platelet aggregates (>200 µm2). There is a correlation between the size formation of platelet aggregates and HMW vWF multimer loss following exposure to shear. In addition, the reduced platelet aggregation size and HMW vWF multimers were associated with shear‐induced ADAMTS13 cleavage. In conclusion, the evaluation of platelet aggregate size provides an opportunity for novel approaches in detecting and monitoring bleeding due to pathological shear forces, particularly in those receiving LVAD therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy, and patients with severe aortic stenosis.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Concept/design, analysis/data interpretation, secured funding, drafting/critical revision/approval of the article: Chan
Analysis/data interpretation, statistics, drafting/approval of the article: Inoue
Critical revision/approval of the article: Ki
Analysis/data interpretation, approval of the article: Murashige
Secured funding, approval of the article: Fraser
Concept/design, critical revision/approval of the article: Simmonds, Tansley, Watanabe
Supporting information
Chan CHH, Inoue M, Ki KK, et al. Shear‐dependent platelet aggregation size. Artif Organs. 2020;44:1286–1295. 10.1111/aor.13783
REFERENCES
- 1. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1787–847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Russell SD, Conte JV, Feldman D, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device. N Eng J Med. 2009;361:2241–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Proudfoot AG, Davidson SJ, Strueber M. von Willebrand factor disruption and continuous‐flow circulatory devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1155–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Geisen U, Brehm K, Trummer G, Berchtold‐Herz M, Heilmann C, Beyersdorf F, et al. Platelet secretion defects and acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with ventricular assist devices. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e006519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Katz JN, Adamson RM, John R, Tatooles A, Sundareswaran K, Kallel F, et al. Safety of reduced anti‐thrombotic strategies in HeartMate II patients: a one‐year analysis of the US‐TRACE study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:1542–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Veasey TM, Floroff CK, Strout SE, McElray KL, Brisco‐Bacik MA, Cook JL, et al. Evaluation of anticoagulation and nonsurgical major bleeding in recipients of continuous‐flow left ventricular assist devices. Artif Organs. 2019;43:736–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Springer TA. von Willebrand factor, Jedi knight of the bloodstream. Blood. 2014;124:1412–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nascimbene A, Neelamegham S, Frazier OH, Moake JL, Dong JF. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome associated with left ventricular assist device. Blood. 2016;127:3133–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bartoli CR, Restle DJ, Zhang DM, Acker MA, Atluri P. Pathologic von Willebrand factor degradation with a left ventricular assist device occurs via two distinct mechanisms: mechanical demolition and enzymatic cleavage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:281–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gralnick HR, Williams SB, Morisato DK. Effect of multimeric structure of the factor VIII/von Willebrand factor protein on binding to platelets. Blood. 1981;58:387–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Meyer AL, Malehsa D, Budde U, Bara C, Haverich A, Strueber M. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with a centrifugal or axial continuous flow left ventricular assist device. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2:141–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Heilmann C, Geisen U, Beyersdorf F, Nakamura L, Trummer G, Berchtold‐Herz M, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome is an early‐onset problem in ventricular assist device patients. Eur J Cardio‐thorac Surg. 2011: 1328–33; discussion 233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dong JF. Cleavage of ultra‐large von Willebrand factor by ADAMTS‐13 under flow conditions. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1710–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhang X, Halvorsen K, Zhang CZ, Wong WP, Springer TA. Mechanoenzymatic cleavage of the ultralarge vascular protein von Willebrand factor. Science. 2009;324:1330–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jilma‐Stohlawetz P, Quehenberger P, Schima H, Stoiber M, Knöbl P, Steinlechner B, et al. Acquired von Willebrand factor deficiency caused by LVAD is ADAMTS‐13 and platelet dependent. Thromb Res. 2016;137:196–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Schneider SW, Nuschele S, Wixforth A, Gorzelanny C, Alexander‐Katz A, Netz RR, et al. Shear‐induced unfolding triggers adhesion of von Willebrand factor fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:7899–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lippok S, Radtke M, Obser T, Kleemeier L, Schneppenheim R, Budde U, et al. Shear‐induced unfolding and enzymatic cleavage of full‐length VWF multimers. Biophys J. 2016;110:545–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kroll MH, Hellums JD, McIntire LV, Schafer AI, Moake JL. Platelets and shear stress. Blood. 1996;88:1525–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sakariassen KS, Orning L, Turitto VT. The impact of blood shear rate on arterial thrombus formation. Future Sci OA. 2015;1:Fso30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gogia S, Neelamegham S. Role of fluid shear stress in regulating VWF structure, function and related blood disorders. Biorheology. 2015;52:319–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Resnick N, Yahav H, Shay‐Salit A, Shushy M, Schubert S, Zilberman LCM, et al. Fluid shear stress and the vascular endothelium: for better and for worse. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2003;81:177–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Thamsen B, Mevert R, Lommel M, Preikschat P, Gaebler J, Krabatsch T, et al. A two‐stage rotary blood pump design with potentially lower blood trauma: a computational study. Int J Artif Organs. 2016;39:178–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bartoli CR, Kang J, Zhang D, Howard J, Acker M, Atluri P, et al. Left ventricular assist device design reduces von Willebrand factor degradation: a comparative study between the HeartMate II and the EVAHEART left ventricular assist system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1239–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Fraser KH, Zhang T, Taskin ME, Griffith BP, Wu ZJ. A quantitative comparison of mechanical blood damage parameters in rotary ventricular assist devices: shear stress, exposure time and hemolysis index. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134:81002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gross‐Hardt S, Hesselmann F, Arens J, Steinseifer U, Vercaemst L, Windisch W, et al. Low‐flow assessment of current ECMO/ECCO2R rotary blood pumps and the potential effect on hemocompatibility. Crit Care. 2019;23:348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Thamsen B, Blumel B, Schaller J, Paschereit CO, Affeld K, Goubergrits L, et al. Numerical analysis of blood damage potential of the HeartMate II and HeartWare HVAD rotary blood pumps. Artif Organs. 2015;39:651–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bourque K, Cotter C, Dague C, Harjes D, Dur O, Duhamel J, et al. Design rationale and preclinical evaluation of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist system for hemocompatibility. ASAIO J. 2016;62:375–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tsai HM, Sussman II, Nagel RL. Shear stress enhances the proteolysis of von Willebrand factor in normal plasma. Blood. 1994;83:2171–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jhun CS, Siedlecki C, Xu L, Lukic B, Newswanger R, Yeager E, et al. Stress and exposure time on von Willebrand factor degradation. Artif Organs. 2019;43:199–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Egger C, Maas J, Hufen T, Schmitz‐Rode T, Steinseifer U. Establishing a method for in vitro investigation of mechanical parameters causing acquired von Willebrand syndrome in ventricular assist devices. Artif Organs. 2013;37:833–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chan CHH, Pieper IL, Fleming S, Friedmann Y, Foster G, Hawkins K, et al. The effect of shear stress on the size, structure, and function of human von Willebrand factor. Artif Organs. 2014;38:741–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kalbhenn J, Schlagenhauf A, Rosenfelder S, Schmutz A, Zieger B. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome and impaired platelet function during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: rapid onset and fast recovery. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37:985–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vincentelli A, Susen S, Le Tourneau T, Six I, Fabre O, Juthier F, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in aortic stenosis. N Eng J Med. 2003;349:343–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rana A, Westein E, Niego B, Hagemeyer CE. Shear‐dependent platelet aggregation: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019;6:141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chen D, Daigh CA, Hendricksen JI, Pruthi RK, Nichols WL, Heit JA, et al. A highly‐sensitive plasma von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity assay by flow cytometry. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:323–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Grossmann S, Lohse D, Sun C. High‐reynolds number taylor‐couette turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2016;48:53–80. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Horobin JT, Watanabe N, Hakozaki M, Sabapathy S, Simmonds MJ. Shear‐stress mediated nitric oxide production within red blood cells: a dose‐response. Clin Hemorheol Micro. 2019;71:203–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Watanabe N, Shimada T, Hakozaki M, Hara R. Visualization of erythrocyte deformation induced by supraphysiological shear stress. Int J Artif Organs. 2018;41:838–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chan CHH, Pieper IL, Robinson CR, Friedmann Y, Kanamarlapudi V, Thornton CA. Shear stress‐induced total blood trauma in multiple species. Artif Organs. 2017;41:934–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chan CHH, Diab S, Moody K, Frazier OH, Sampaio LC, Fraser CD, et al. In vitro hemocompatibility evaluation of ventricular assist devices in pediatric flow conditions: a benchmark study. Artif Organs. 2018;42:1028–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Jackson SP. The growing complexity of platelet aggregation. Blood. 2007;109:5087–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ware JA, Reaves WH, Horak JK, Solis RT. Defective platelet aggregation in patients undergoing surgical repair of cyanotic congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;36:289–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. De Ceunynck K, Rocha S, Feys HB, De Meyer SF, Uji‐i H, Deckmyn H, et al. Local elongation of endothelial cell‐anchored von Willebrand factor strings precedes ADAMTS13 protein‐mediated proteolysis. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:36361–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Affeld K, Goubergrits L, Watanabe N, Kertzscher U. Numerical and experimental evaluation of platelet deposition to collagen coated surface at low shear rates. J Biomech. 2013;46:430–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Watanabe NAK, Schaller J, Schmitmeier J, Reininger AJ, Goubergrits L, Kertzscher U. Investigation of human platelet adhesion under low shear conditions in a rotational flow chamber. J Biorheol. 2011;25:64–70. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bartoli CR, Dowling RD. The next wave of mechanical circulatory support devices. Cardiac Interventions Today. 2019;13:53–9. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Gohean JR, Larson ER, Hsi BH, Kurusz M, Smalling RW, Longoria RG. Scaling the low‐shear pulsatile TORVAD for pediatric heart failure. ASAIO J. 2017;63:198–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Vincent F, Rauch A, Loobuyck V, Robin E, Nix C, Vincentelli A, et al. Arterial pulsatility and circulating von Willebrand factor in patients on mechanical circulatory support. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2106–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wever‐Pinzon O, Selzman CH, Drakos SG, Saidi A, Stoddard GJ, Gilbert EM, et al. Pulsatility and the risk of nonsurgical bleeding in patients supported with the continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device HeartMate II. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:517–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.