Table 2.
Author and year | Study design | Country | Exposure/ prevention measure | Outcome/ evaluation tool |
Main findings | Quality assessment |
Cao et al, 20209 | Qualitative interviews | China | HCW (n=37)/ Coping strategies as video chats or telephone calls with family and friends |
Interview | Psychological support may help buffer negative impact on stress. | CASP (No: n=7, Yes: n=2) |
Chen et al, 202039 | Qualitative interviews | China | HCW (n=13), stress, influence on mental health/ psychological intervention medical team, hotline | Interview | Not scared to get infected, help for resting, skills to cope with patients’ anxiety and PPE shortage needed | CASP (No: n=5, Yes: n=2, can’t tell: n=2) |
Chen et al, 202034 | Ecological study | China | Caesarean delivery (n=17)/ appropriate PPE (N95 masks, goggles, protective suits, disposable caps, rubber gloves), if endotracheal intubation air-purifying respirator; negative operating room, | RT-PCR | No medical staff involved in operation were infected | GRADE: very low |
Htun et al, 202036 | Cross-sectional study | Singapore | Hospital overall (staff n=10 583)/ Fever and sickness surveillance for staff; risk-based PPE; enhanced surveillance for unwell staff |
Mixed (clinical assessment, swabs for PCR) | No infection with COVID-19 | AXIS: positive aspect n=10, negative n=4, don’t know n=6 |
Huang et al, 202035 | Ecological study | China | Nurses, 35 confirmed, 260 suspected cases/ PPE (hat, respirator, inner gloves, eye mask, protective clothing. Shoe covers, isolation gowns, outer gloves, face shield), hand hygiene, ward disinfection, medical waste management, sterilisation of patient care devices, management of occupational exposure. Teaching. Shift schedule evaluated; psychological counselling |
Not specified | Zero infection rate in nurses | GRADE: very low |
Huang et al, 202030 | Ecological study | China | Radiology department, 3083 suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients/ Reconfiguring of the department, PPE (protective clothing, surgical cap, N95 mask, gloves, face shields, goggles), training, donning and doffing under supervision, strategic planning of examination procedures | Clinical symptoms | None of the staff became infected. | GRADE: very low |
Kabesch et al, 202038 | Ecological study | Germany | Outbreak scenario, midwife → colleagues / Face masks, social distancing in cafeteria and break rooms, on site visits hygiene experts, staff training, transparent, timely and direct communication, testing all symptomatic employees |
Laboratory test for symptomatic staff | Successful containment of the outbreak within 3 weeks, 36 staff members tested positive | GRADE: very low |
Malik 202033 | Ecological study | Pakistan | Admission of a COVID-19 positive patient to the ICU/ HCW with N95 or surgical masks |
PCR | All HCW (n=34) tested negative for COVID-19 | GRADE: low |
Ng et al, 202032 | Ecological study | Singapore | one patient with pneumonia/ HCW (n=41) exposed during aerosol-generating procedures |
Clinical monitoring and PCR | No HCW infected | GRADE: low |
Wee et al, 202031 | Ecological study | Singapore | Emergency department, PCR tests for all patients with respiratory syndromes, n=70 patients tested positive/ PPE risk stratified |
PCR testing, extensive surveillance | No nosocomial transmission | GRADE: low |
Zhu et al et al, 202037 | Ecological study | China | one patient with endonasal adenoma resection, general care and operation/ no prevention measures initially before confirmed infection | Diagnosis of infection not specified. | four nurses without prevention measures (and 10 persons without contact to the patient) got infected, none of the persons in the operation room or under specific prevention got infected. | GRADE: very low |
AXIS, Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies; CASP, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations; HCW, healthcare worker.