Table 3.
Study | HR | SE | 95% CI | z | P | Weight (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Late gadolinium enhancement scar imaging | ||||||
Murtagh G. | 1.14 | 0.291 | 0.570 to 1.710 | 45.75 | ||
Kato S. | 7.913 | 2.019 | 3.956 to 11.870 | 7.55 | ||
Pöyhönen P. | 1.027 | 0.262 | 0.514 to 1.540 | 46.7 | ||
Total (fixed effects) | 1.141 | 0.194 | 0.761 to 1.520 | 5.887 | <0.001 | 100 |
Total (random effects) | 1.598 | 0.601 | 0.421 to 2.776 | 2.662 | 0.008 | 100 |
Test for heterogeneity | ||||||
Q | 11.4438 | |||||
DF | 2 | |||||
Significance level | P = 0.0033 | |||||
I2 (inconsistency) | 82.52% | |||||
95% CI for I2 | 46.43 to 94.30 | |||||
T1-mapping and other relaxometry techniques | ||||||
Kanagala P. | 1.689 | 0.431 | 0.845 to 2.533 | 15.61 | ||
Schelbert E.B. | 1.75 | 0.446 | 0.875 to 2.625 | 14.65 | ||
Duca F. | 1.099 | 0.28 | 0.549 to 1.649 | 32.12 | ||
Mascherbauer J. | 0.99 | 0.253 | 0.495 to 1.485 | 37.62 | ||
Total (fixed effects) | 1.221 | 0.161 | 0.906 to 1.536 | 7.606 | <0.001 | 100 |
Total (random effects) | 1.245 | 0.18 | 0.892 to 1.599 | 6.906 | <0.001 | 100 |
Test for heterogeneity | ||||||
Q | 3.6099 | |||||
DF | 3 | |||||
Significance level | P = 0.3068 | |||||
I2 (inconsistency) | 16.90% | |||||
95% CI for I2 | 0.00 to 89.27 | |||||
Others CMR methods including ischaemia assessment | ||||||
Kanagala P. | 1.92 | 0.49 | 0.960 to 2.880 | 57.45 | ||
Aschauer S. | 4.9 | 1.25 | 2.450 to 7.350 | 42.55 | ||
Total (fixed effects) | 2.317 | 0.456 | 1.423 to 3.210 | 5.08 | <0.001 | 100 |
Total (random effects) | 3.188 | 1.473 | 0.300 to 6.076 | 2.164 | 0.03 | 100 |
Test for heterogeneity | ||||||
Q | 4.927 | |||||
DF | 1 | |||||
Significance level | P = 0.0264 | |||||
I2 (inconsistency) | 79.70% | |||||
95% CI for I2 | 12.50 to 95.29 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DF, degree of freedom; FU, follow-up (in months); HR, hazard ratio; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; Q, chi-squared statistic; SE, standard error.