Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb;76:116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.11.011

Table 4.

Summary of clinically relevant cut-offs for several cardiac MRI metrics which have prognostic significance.

First Author Cardiac MRI metric Thresholds for prognosis Quantification and segmentation methods
Murtagh G.
2016
LGE LGE volume 5.7% Signal intensity >5 SD above the mean signal intensity of remote myocardium
Kato S.
2015
LGE LGE volume 6% Signal intensity >2 SD above the mean signal intensity of a remote myocardium
Pöyhönen P.
2014
LGE LGE volume ≥ 17% Visual scoring on AHA 17-segment model of the LV
Kanagala P.
2019
iECV\ECV iECV >16.8 ml/m2
ECV >30.7
iECV = ECV (%) × indexed LVEDV
Schelbert E.B.
2017
ECV ECV >29% ECV = λ × (1 − haematocrit), where λ = (ΔR1myocardium)/(ΔR1bloodpool)
Duca F.
2016
ECV ECV >28.9% ECV = λ × (1 − haematocrit), where λ = (ΔR1myocardium)/(ΔR1bloodpool)
Mascherbauer J.
2013
Post-contrast T1 T1 time < 388.3 ms Measured in undefined myocardium
Kanagala P.
2018
Tissue characterisation +
Stress CMR
Perfusion defect [24] Full clinical assessment leading to new diagnosis
Aschauer S.
2016
RVSD RV EF <45% Standard volumetric contours

Abbreviations: AHA, american heart association; CI, confidence interval; ECV, extracellular volume; FU, follow-up (in months); HR, hazard ratio; iECV, total extracellular volume of the myocardium indexed to body surface area; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LV, left ventricle; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RVEF, right ventricle ejection fraction; RVSD, right ventricular systolic dysfunction; SD, standard deviation.