Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;14(1):53–68. doi: 10.1111/eva.13087

Table 1.

Best linear mixed effect models explaining body size (ITD; mm), body size variation (coefficient of variation (CV) of ITD as %) and Trifolium pratense seed set across all our sampling sites. Model 1 differs from models 2 and 3 in that the predictor ecosystem type of model 1 is replaced by road density in models 2 and 3 (respectively at the 250 m and 1,000 m scale). See Table S8 for beta coefficients and related statistics

Response variable Predictors F‐value df p‐value
Body size (model 1) Temperature 11.653 1 <.001***
Day of the year 7.049 1 .032*
Ecosystem type: Species identity 6.684 2 .001***
Body size (model 2) Temperature 9.017 1 .002**
Day of the year 8.718 1 .020*
Species identity 372.651 2 <.001***
Road density (250 m) 9.051 1 .002**
Body size (model 3) Temperature 8.725 1 .003**
Day of the year 7.901 1 .025*
Road density (1,000 m): Species identity 5.185 2 .005**
CV body size (model 4) Species identity 4.409 2 .017*
Temperature 11.373 1 .001***
Sample size 0.944 1 .336
T. pratense seed set (model 5) Visitation rates 23.045 1 <.001***
CWM body size 7.906 1 .006**
CWM of CV body size 5.510 1 .021*

df, degrees of freedom.

*

p ≤ .05;

**

p ≤ .01;

***

p ≤ .001.