Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;13(12):E56–E83.

TABLE 4.

Duration of response—single cycle, uncontrolled studies

STUDY Fabi 201324 Farahvash 200722 Hexsel 200952 Dubina 201346
INDICATION Lateral canthal rhytides (N=40) Glabellar lines, frontal lines and lateral canthal lines (N=115) Glabellar wrinkles (N=105) Glabellar and forehead lines (N=20)
STUDY DESIGN Uncontrolled (two-center, prospective, evaluator-blinded, open-label, randomized, comparative, split-face study [one vs. three injection sites]) Uncontrolled (single-arm prospective study) Uncontrolled, randomized, multicenter, blinded study Split-face, randomized controlled trial
TREATMENT Total dose:
  • AboBoNT-A 72U (36U on each side of the face)

Administered through a single injection on one side, and three injection points on the other.
Average units per site per injection:
  • Glabella: AboBoNT-A 90U

  • Forehead: AboBoNT-A 150U

  • Lateral canthus: AboBoNT-A 76U

AboBoNT-A 50U
Patients were randomized to 3 groups, each receiving injections diluted at 15 days, 8 days, and 8 hours prior to injections
AboBoNT-A, up to 65U
AboBoNT-A, up to 65U + hyaluronic acid filler, up to 1mL
MUSCLE TARGET Lateral orbital/canthal area Corrugators, frontalis, lateral orbicularis oculi Corrugators and procerus muscles Bilateral forehead and glabella
MEASURE OF DURATION Maximal contraction of lateral periocular rhytides measured by a blinded investigator using a 4-point Photographic scale (0=no wrinkles; 1=mild wrinkles; 2=moderate wrinkles; 3=severe wrinkles). Wrinkle improvement was assessed on a scale ranging from 0 (no improvement) to 3 (significant improvement), evaluated by investigators based on pre- and post-injection photographs Investigator-, patient- and specialist-assessed motility of the treated area using a four-point qualitative scale (1, unaltered; 2, slightly reduced; 3, moderately reduced; 4, very reduced), at each visit. Glabellar wrinkles were rated on a 4-point scale.
Forehead wrinkle ratings on a 5-point scale. Photographs were rated by two blinded dermatologists.
A 1-point improvement was considered improved and a >1-point improvement was markedly improved.
Assessments were made for dynamic (lines induced by contraction) and static (lines persisting at rest) wrinkles.
Patient evaluation of improvement compared with baseline in wrinkle look and feel were also reported
ASSESSMENT TIME POINTS AFTER 12 WEEKS Day 120 (Week 16) Months 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Day 112 Week 24
RESULTS RELEVANT TO DURATION Reduction from baseline in investigator-assessed wrinkle score at Day 120:
  • Magnitude of change values were not stated, but all values were significant compared with baseline (p<0.001) for single and three-point injections at maximal contraction and at rest

Degree of wrinkle improvement from baseline at Month 3, 4, and 5 (n=108):
  • 1 (minimal response): 38.9%, 29.6%, and n/a, respectively.

  • 2 (moderate response): 31.5%, 15.7%, and 17.6%, respectively

  • 3 (significant response): 11.1%, 2.8%, and 2.8%, respectively

Duration of response, as assessed by the investigators (n=108):
  • No response: 2.8%

  • 2 to 3 months: 14.8%

  • 3 to 4 months: 33.3%

  • 4 to 5 months: 29.6%

  • 5 to 6 months: 19.4%

As noted by authors, all benefit was gone by Month 7.
Average motility scores at Day 112 for injections reconstituted at 8 hours, 8 days, and 15 days prior to injection:
  • Investigator-assessed: 2.2, 2.5, and 2.7, respectively

  • Patient-assessed: 2.1, 2.3, and 2.5, respectively

  • Specialist-assessed: 2.3, 2.4, and 2.7, respectively

Percentage of patients improved and markedly improved at Week 24 in the aboBoNT-A only group (dermatologist assessment):
  • Forehead (static): 50% and 10%, respectively

  • Forehead (dynamic): 85% and 30%, respectively

  • Glabellar (static): 20% and 5%, respectively

  • Glabellar (dynamic): 60% and 25%, respectively

Percentage of patients who reported an improvement from baseline at Week 24 in the aboBoNT-A only group (patient assessment):
  • Forehead, look: 50%

  • Forehead, feel: 45%

  • Glabellar, look: 50%

  • Glabellar, feel: 60%

SPONSOR Medicis None Ipsen (research grant to the Brazilian Center for Studies in Dermatology) Medicis Aesthetics Inc. (research grant)
STUDY Hexsel 201347 Joseph 201648 Karbassi 201821
INDICATION Full-face wrinkles (N=90) Glabellar lines (N=30) Glabellar lines (N=104)
STUDY DESIGN Prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label study of full-face injections of three different doses of aboBoNT-A Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, open-label study Uncontrolled (cross sectional, descriptive study)
TREATMENT Group 1 (n=26):
  • AboBoNT-A 120 to 165U

Group 2 (n=29):
  • AboBoNT-A 166 to 205U

Group 3 (n=30):
  • AboBoNT-A 206 to 250U

AboBoNT-A 120U (equal doses into 5 injection sites) AboBoNT-A 45–60U (10–20U per injection point)
MUSCLE TARGET Upper face:
  • Lateral canthal lines (periorbital) wrinkles

  • Glabella lines

  • Forehead wrinkles

Middle face:
  • Lower eyelid

  • Nasal wrinkles

  • Malar wrinkles

Lower face
  • Perioral wrinkles

  • Asymmetric smile or gummy smile

  • Cellulitic chin

  • Marionette lines

Corrugators and procerus muscle Corrugator muscles
MEASURE OF DURATION Clinical 0–3 scoring for glabellar frown lines, photonumeric atlas for the assessment of lateral canthal lines severity and Forehead Wrinkle Severity scales were used for wrinkle assessment in these areas. Investigator’s assessment at maximum frown using a 4-point categorical assessment at each time point following treatment compared with the baseline assessment. Subject satisfaction was also assessed. Glabellar Line Severity Score (0 stands for none, 1 for mild, 2 for moderate, and 3 for severe glabellar lines) assessed at rest and maximum frown (photographic assessment). Responders were defined as patients with none or mild glabellar lines.
ASSESSMENT TIME POINTS AFTER 12 WEEKS Weeks 16, 20, and 24 Day 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, and 300 (or end-of-study, whichever was soonest) Day 120 and 180
RESULTS RELEVANT TO DURATION Estimated mean values of forehead wrinkle severity assessment scores at Week 16, 20 and 24 post-injection:
  • Group 1: 1.8, 2.3, and 2.5, respectively (baseline: 2.4)

  • Group 2: 2.2, 2.5, and 2.6, respectively (baseline 2.7)

  • Group 3: 2.0, 2.3, and 2.5, respectively (baseline 2.6)

Estimated mean clinical scores for glabellar frown lines at Week 16, 20, and 24 post-injection:
  • Group 1: 1.3, 1.4, and 1.7, respectively (baseline 1.9)

  • Group 2: 1.2, 1.4, and 1.7, respectively (baseline 2.1)

  • Group 3: 1.1, 1.3, and 1.5, respectively (baseline 2.2)

Estimated mean photonumerical scores for lateral canthal lines wrinkles severity at Week 16, 20 and 24 post-injection:
  • Group 1: 1.5, 1.6, and 1.8, respectively (baseline 2.1)

  • Group 2: 1.9, 2.1, and 2.1, respectively (baseline 2.4)

  • Group 3: 1.8, 2.1, and 2.3, respectively (baseline 2.2)

Values have been estimated from the published figures.
Statistically significant reductions in the wrinkle scores were seen only at 16 weeks for forehead and lateral canthal lines wrinkles (all p<0.001, with no difference between the groups), although clinical effects were observed at Week 24. Statistically significant improvement was seen in glabellar lines, with results lasting more than 24 weeks (all p<0.001, with no difference between the groups).
Percentage of patients with a ≥1 grade improvement of glabellar lines at maximum frown (investigator’s assessment):
  • Day 90: 27/29 (93.1%)

  • Day 120: 25/29 (86.2%)

  • Day 150: 13/21 (61.9%)

  • Day 180: 10/13 (76.9%)

  • Day 210: 4/5 (80.0%)

Percentage of patients with a ≥1 grade improvement of glabellar lines at maximum frown (subject assessment):
  • Day 90: 28/29 (96.6%)

  • Day 120: 26/29 (89.7%)

  • Day 150: 14/21 (66.7%)

  • Day 180: 7/13 (53.8%)

  • Day 210: 2/5 (40%)

Responders (percentage of patients with no or mild wrinkles) at Days 120 and 180:
  • At maximum frown: 72.1% and 29.8%, respectively

  • At rest: 78.8% and 14.1%, respectively

Maximum injection durability within 3, 4, and 6 months post-injection was 82%, 52%, and 38%, respectively.
Durability is not defined.
SPONSOR Galderma (research grant) Galderma Not specified
STUDY Kiripolsky 201131 Punga 201617
INDICATION Facial rhytides (N=185) Glabellar lines (N=62)
STUDY DESIGN Uncontrolled (retrospective, single-site, two-phase study) Multicenter, randomized, comparative study of aboBoNT-A at 2 injection volumes
TREATMENT Phase 1:
  • AboBoNT-A 10U/0.1mL saline, average dose 93.7U across injected muscles

Phase 2:
  • AboBoNT-A 12U/0.1mL saline, average dose 99.6U across injected muscles

AboBoNT-A 50U: Injection volumes 0.05mL (n=30) and 0.1mL (n=32) per injection point
MUSCLE TARGET According to patient need: lateral canthal lines, depressor anguli oris, frontalis, glabella, nasalis, mentalis, and platysmal bands Procerus and corrugator muscles
MEASURE OF DURATION Efficacy (duration of action) as measured by questionnaire in the clinic and during telephone follow ups (duration of action: subjects described time from onset of relaxation until complete and full activity of muscle activity). Wrinkle severity at maximum frown using 5-grade, validated scale performed both live and by a blinded independent evaluator. Compound muscle action potential using electroneurography at one site.
ASSESSMENT TIME POINTS AFTER 12 WEEKS Week 16 Month 3, 4, and 6
RESULTS RELEVANT TO DURATION Patients reporting therapeutic activity at Week 16 post-injection:
  • Phase 1: 10.8% (7/65 patients)

  • Phase 2: 19.0% (11/58 patients)

Mean (SD) duration of action for all sites treated was 8.7 (4.8) weeks in Phase 1 and 10.1 (4.5) weeks in Phase 2.
Percentage of patients showing a ≥1 grade improvement in wrinkle severity at maximum frown on Month 3, 4, and 6 (investigator assessment):
  • AboBoNT-A 0.05mL: 70%, 59%, and 17%, respectively

  • AboBoNT-A 0.1mL: 90%, 68%, and 28%, respectively

Percentage of patients showing a ≥2 grade improvement in wrinkle severity at maximum frown on Month 3, 4, and 6 (investigator assessment):
  • AboBoNT-A 0.05mL: 27%, 14%, and 0%, respectively

  • AboBoNT-A 0.1mL: 39%, 26%, and 0%, respectively

Percentage of patients showing a ≥1 grade improvement in wrinkle severity at rest on Month 6 (investigator assessment):
  • AboBoNT-A 0.05mL: 55.2%

  • AboBoNT-A 0.1mL: 59.4%

Change in CMAP amplitude as a percentage of baseline values (100%) at Month 6:
  • AboBoNT-A 0.05mL: 59.7%

  • AboBoNT-A 0.1mL: 51.6%

SPONSOR None Galderma (supply of equipment and product)

AboBoNT-A, abobotulinumtoxinA; incoBoNT-A, incobotulinumtoxinA; onaBoNT-A, onabotulinumtoxinA