TABLE 4.
Correlation between average QGS and other parameters
| PARAMETERS | AVERAGE QGS OF FACIAL LIFT BY BOTH DERMATOLOGISTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman’s rho | Age (years) | Correlation Coefficient | 0.452* |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.027 | ||
| Patient satisfaction | Correlation Coefficient | 0.184 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.378 | ||
| Wrinkle smoothing of forehead lines | Correlation Coefficient | 0.534** | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.006 | ||
| Wrinkle smoothing of crow’s feet | Correlation Coefficient | 0.260 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.209 | ||
| Wrinkle smoothing of nasolabial folds | Correlation Coefficient | 0.605** | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.001 | ||
| Wrinkle smoothing of Marionette lines | Correlation Coefficient | 0.440* | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.028 | ||
QGS, Quartile Grading Scale;
* significant;
** highly significant