Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;25(2):487–495. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03396-0

Table 2.

Comparison between healthy sites and diseased sites

Clinical and biochemical parameters Sites Mean ± SD First quartile Median Third quartile
PlI Healthy sites 0.1 ± 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Diseased sites 0.6 ± 0.7*** 0.0 0.0 1.0
GCF amount (μl/pocket) Healthy sites 0.5 ± 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6
Diseased sites 1.3 ± 0.8*** 0.6 1.1 1.7
PD (mm) Healthy sites 2.1 ± 0.7 2.0 2.0 2.0
Diseased sites 4.9 ± 1.1*** 4.0 5.0 5.5
CAL (mm) Healthy sites 3.1 ± 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0
Diseased sites 6.6 ± 2.1*** 5.0 6.0 8.0
GI Healthy sites 0.2 ± 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Diseased sites 1.3 ± 0.7*** 1.0 1.0 2.0
ABR ratio (%) Healthy sites 15.2 ± 19.0 0.0 9.2 27.9
Diseased sites 47.0 ± 23.4*** 28.8 44.1 66.4
ALP activity (μU/pocket) Healthy sites 78.4 ± 129.6 19.3 30.8 80.5
Diseased sites 445.7 ± 849.6*** 39.0 127.5 386.1
Protein amount (μg/pocket) Healthy sites 14.0 ± 10.3 6.1 11.6 19.1
Diseased sites 33.0 ± 25.5*** 16.1 25.3 39.0
Hb amount (ng/pocket) Healthy sites 51.2 ± 48.8 7.4 35.7 86.8
Diseased sites 86.5 ± 43.9*** 53.6 96.6 119.7

Healthy sites PD ≤ 4 mm, BOP (−); n = 76

Diseased sites PD ≥ 4 mm, BOP (+); n = 76

***P < 0.001 versus healthy sites