Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 21;11:1971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81454-7

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) for the effects of tDCS on different dimensions of emotional processing.

Sham
M(Sd)
vmFC stimulation
M (SD)
dlPFC stimulation
M (SD)
Arousal
High Arousal 5.72 (2.10) 4.88 (2.61) 5.94 (1.98)
Medium Arousal 3.33 (.99) 2.90 (1.39) 3.85 (1.17)
Low Arousal 3.11 (1.28) 2.48 (1.16) 3.39 (1.22)
All images 4.05 (1.29) 3.42 (0.92) 4.39 (1.42)
Valence
High Valence 6.62 (1.12) 6.65 (0.84) 6.06 (1.31)
Neutral Valence 4.10 (.89) 4.05 (0.93) 3.86 (1.31)
Low Valence 3.12 (.93) 2.83 (0.86) 3.08 (1.04)
All images 4.61 (1.69) 4.51 (1.68) 4.33 (1.50)
Dominance
High Dominance 4.76 (1.48) 4.59 (1.22) 4.74 (1.41)
Medium Dominance 3.88 (1.33) 4.01 (1.53) 4.26 (1.28)
Low Dominance 3.88 (1.54) 3.42 (1.38) 3.77 (1.36)
All images 4.17 (1.55) 3.51 (1.18) 4.25 (1.24)

tDCS = transcranial direct current stimulation ; M = mean; sd = standard eviation; vmPFC = ventromedial prefrontal coretx; dlPFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.