Table 1.

Paired t-tests comparing categorization responses for the original parent faces to responses for their face variations.

Korean participants			German participants
Comparison	t(47) =	p =  d =	Comparison	t(47) =	p =  d =
a_original—a_cmouth	2.52	.015 0.365	a_original—a_cmouth	1.88	.066 0.271
a_original—a_cnose	5.28	< .001 0.761	a_original—a_cnose	3.14	.003 0.454
a_original—a_ccontour	6.71	< .001 0.969	a_original—a_ccontour	5.26	< .001 0.758
a_original—a_ctexture	30.93	< .001 4.465	a_original—a_ctexture	28.41	< .001 4.102
a_original—a_ceyes	28.87	< .001 4.167	a_original—a_ceyes	26.23	< .001 3.787
c_original—c_amouth	2.47	.017 0.357	c_original—c_amouth	3.20	.002 0.461
c_original—c_anose	3.07	.004 0.443	c_original—c_anose	3.60	.001 0.520
c_original—c_acontour	7.17	< .001 0.872	c_original -c_acontour	8.68	< .001 1.252
c_original—c_atexture	27.51	< .001 3.004	c_original—c_atexture	33.08	< .001 4.773
c_original—c_aeyes	33.22	< .001 3.577	c_original—c_aeyes	31.41	< .001 4.534

Significant p-values after Bonferroni correction for multiple significance tests (n = 10) are shown in bold.

a_original: Asian parent, a_cmouth: Asian face with Caucasian mouth, a_cnose: Asian face with Caucasian nose, a_ccontour: Asian face with Caucasian contour, a_ctexture: Asian face with Caucasian texture, a_ceyes: Asian face with Caucasian eyes, c_original: Caucasian parent, c_amouth: Caucasian face with Asian mouth, c_anose: Caucasian face with Asian nose, c_acontour: Caucasian face with Asian contour, c_atexture Caucasian face with Asian testure, c_aeyes: Caucasian face with Asian eyes.