1 |
Poor quality, poor flow of the site, most information missing, not at all useful for patients |
2 |
Generally poor quality and poor flow, some information listed but many important topics missing, of very limited use to patients |
3 |
Moderate quality, suboptimal flow, some important information is adequately discussed but others poorly discussed, somewhat useful for patients |
4 |
Good quality and generally good flow, most of the relevant information is listed, but some topics not covered, useful for patients |
5 |
Excellent quality and excellent flow, very useful for patients |